Replies

p.s. I am not saying that people cannot express their displeasure at his comments. I'm just saying, "why are so many turning on Sean (attacking) because he made a valid observation about some FReepers?"

Then the reverse is true:

Why are people stepping in and saying we are wrong to say things bout Sean, when all we are doing is making accurate observations about Sean Hannity?

And if we are supposed to support Sean "because he is on our side", then why isn't Sean supposed to support us because "we are on HIS side?"

Many of us here have openly spoken of the errors, lack of strong intellectual ability of Hannity, the lack of coherant response to easily defeated arguments of the left. Well, those are valid observations and there have been numerous examples of it here which would never have been said if Hannity didn't just stab us in the back.

This is a two faced argument, to say we need to roll over when he drops us while we are supposed to support him, while he just openly says he disdains us.

Sean's comments can be repeated over 3 hours a day, he gets to tell his story as many times as he wants, he gets to control the discussion and who listens to the dissent regarding his comments, while we are stuck here making our comments only to each other.

That means Hannity gets to control the argument, and NONE of us get to respond as openly and publically as he does. Our comments here have to be privately searched for, those among us who have been ariculate and complete in our statements are basically anonymous in our response,while Sean has MILLIONS of people who hear his slant on things and believe him BECAUSE HE IS ON THE RADIO and therefore has "credibility"

Hannity lost almost 1000 listeners for these comments, the problem is, just who do we listen to? If Sean moved to a different time slot, and even with the same number of stations carrying him, he would lose share faster than Clinton would stare at AnnaZ.