To: Eva
Ah. Guilt by association. There's another great conservative value . . . not.
To: Cultural Jihad
I was not impressed with the way he handled that CAIR guy last nite.
The use of "controversial" was not the way to illicit a response. Seemed a bit thin and was not interesting or pertinent to the subject at all.
Colmes actually won that one. He said we are controversial too! LOL!
1,949 posted on
02/16/2005 6:47:31 PM PST by
Cold Heat
(What are fears but voices awry?Whispering harm where harm is not and deluding the unwary. Wordsworth)
To: Cultural Jihad
This time the guilt by association is well earned. If conservatives remained quiet, the left would paint us all as anti-semitic Nazis because some supporters of eugenics were on the right. Actually there were just as many leftists who supported eugenics, however (like the founder of Planned Parenthood). But conservatives don't keep quiet and allow the association. We condemn David Duke and neo-Nazis. We can only assume that Muslims who do not speak out and condemn the radicals, condone the violence. They are either with us, or against us. There is no middle ground on terrorism.
1,970 posted on
02/16/2005 6:55:57 PM PST by
Eva
To: Cultural Jihad
This subject is a little 'off thread' but is worth addressing.
It is more than common knowledge the screaming silence of the Muslim communities in this country after the twin towers were hit.
(let alone the dancing in the streets in the middle east.)
All that came out on the news is a sudden victim mentality from the Muslim communities... like, you know, people are looking at them suspiciously... and like, you know, they have rights and all. And you better be sure you don't frisk all the middle-eastern men getting on the planes!!
Maybe it would have helped a little to get at least some lukewarm support and open condemnation of the terrorism instead of instant victim-hood.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson