Replies

You are blind to your idol's feet of clay. Dr. Keyes does not walk on water. In this instance, he played the hypocrite in his labeling and condemning another man's daughter when he kept silent about the mote in his own eye. That is hypocrisy.

In this instance, he played the hypocrite in his labeling and condemning another man's daughter when he kept silent about the mote in his own eye. That is hypocrisy.

Wrong

It would be hypocrisy not to condemn the selfish hedonistic behavior in all homosexual addicts, not to mention rebuke the foolishness of their enablers.

Their predators are probably beyond redemption.

So then, am I a hypocrite if I say Scott Peterson is a murderer? Because surely I know that other murderers exist.

This whole thing, this whole argument makes no sense.

Keyes could be a hypocrite if he spoke out against the VP's daughter and condoned his own daughters behavior, which he did not. He condemned them both.

I fear the left does not know the meaning of the word hypocrite, as is evidence from their support of UN and other hypocritical institutions.

Hypocrite is saying Ward Churchill has freedom of speech, but anyone on the right does not.

Hypocrite is saying I want to ban smoking for health reasons, but homosexual activity is just dandy.

Dr. Keyes spoke his mind on both of these girls, and was consistent on his approach to both of them. How that is being a hypocrite is beyond my mortal knowledge.

It would take someone like Kerry to explain that "nuance" to me.

"You are blind to your idol's feet of clay. Dr. Keyes does not walk on water. In this instance, he played the hypocrite in his labeling and condemning another man's daughter when he kept silent about the mote in his own eye. That is hypocrisy."

Huh? "Blind to you idol's feet of clay"? He's not my idol. LOL! Nor does anyone "walk on water."

Obviously he's not impressed with lesbians either or he wouldn't have "thrown her out" of his house. If he didn't throw her out and exalted lesbianism then I'd say he was a hypocrite. I think he called his daughter a "liberal queer". No, don't see any hypocrisy here. He's consistent and condemns it. I also agree with his assessment of Cheny's daughter - "selfish hedonism." All Keyes did was denounce it - Cheney's daughter and now his own. Try double checking what hypocrisy means instead of this childish tirade of words.

I have to admit I do think you are amusing. Looks like you really HATE Keyes. Perhaps you'd be happier in your rage on a liberal forum. I'm sure they see it the way you do.

In this instance, he played the hypocrite in his labeling and condemning another man's daughter when he kept silent about the mote in his own eye. That is hypocrisy.

Do we know when she told him and when she told the public. If she told him prior to going public, would you consider it okay for him to break the news publicly about her, instead of her doing it herself?