Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Socialists Attack the Constitution (Feinstein Proposal)
The Reality Check ^ | 13 February 2005 | Jeff Adams

Posted on 02/13/2005 7:54:43 AM PST by Lando Lincoln

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Lando

1 posted on 02/13/2005 7:54:43 AM PST by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

"Only fools, the unthinking, and those who wish to see America become a full-blown socialist state will back Senator Feinstein’s plan."

Indeed!


2 posted on 02/13/2005 7:59:24 AM PST by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
She can submit any and as many bills as she cares to submit.

They will all have a snowball's chance in Hell.

Memo to DiFi: The Democrats are not in charge anymore.

3 posted on 02/13/2005 7:59:29 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Our two coasts are populated with liberals who know exactly what they're doing with regard to eliminating the Electoral
College. They also are sufficiently adept at screwing around with the language to convince the Consititutionally ignorant that majority rule means nothing more than plurality of numbers. States' Rights is the foundation
of the Constitution. THAT part they omit!


4 posted on 02/13/2005 8:00:43 AM PST by Grendel9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln; Neets; Darksheare; scott0347; timpad; Conspiracy Guy; NYC GOP Chick; MeekOneGOP; ...

this is a very good thing to read.


5 posted on 02/13/2005 8:00:45 AM PST by King Prout (Remember John Adam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Senator Feinstein wants to abolish the Electoral College.
======
This loser is another one of our fine Communists in the Congress. Of course the far-leftists want to abolish the Electoral College, it is an OBSTACLE for them and their Marxist agenda. They feel they can muster enough 'useful idiots' votes in the leftist s***-holes in this country to win popular votes. This had better be blocked -- because too it is another attack on our beloved Constitution WHICH PROTECTS US FROM GOVERNMENT TRYANNY, the very vehicle these maggots (leftists) want to be able to use to convert this country into massive government RULE. MARXISM TO THE HILT!!!


6 posted on 02/13/2005 8:00:57 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

And even if they did, an amendment would have to be ratified by 3/4 of the states, including many small ones. Does she really think they would vote to diminish their power in national elections?


7 posted on 02/13/2005 8:01:48 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

It still wouldn't mean they'd get their candidate in power...Wouldn't have gotten Kerry in, wouldn't have gotten Clinton in either...


8 posted on 02/13/2005 8:03:19 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln; King Prout

Excellent read.
Hopefully FineSwine gets her bill AND her butt burnt off for it.


9 posted on 02/13/2005 8:03:44 AM PST by Darksheare (Red Sun rising, Drown without inhaling. Within, the dark holds hard. Higher than hope my cure lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

I hope that in her lifetime Kaleefornia goes "Red" in National and Statewide elections. Her head will spin so fast her wattle will get whiplash.


10 posted on 02/13/2005 8:05:46 AM PST by Enterprise ("Dance with the Devil by the Pale Moonlight" - Islam compels you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

It still wouldn't mean they'd get their candidate in power...Wouldn't have gotten Kerry in, wouldn't have gotten Clinton in either...
======
Your are right. But could have...but more important, they CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO MODIFY OUR CONSTITUTION FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES!!!! That is what this is about, to set a precedent of changing it, starting such momentum, then going after our other protections. These people are POWER-MAD COMMIES, desperate in thier fight to CONTROL.


11 posted on 02/13/2005 8:05:56 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grendel9
"Our two coasts are populated with liberals who know exactly what they're doing with regard to eliminating the Electoral College.

Not even that. It is a small number of mega-cities in the Northeast, Midwest, and West Coast that are overwhelmingly Democrat.

12 posted on 02/13/2005 8:06:10 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I agree with you. This is something that needs to be fought.


13 posted on 02/13/2005 8:07:00 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

Thanks for the ping.


14 posted on 02/13/2005 8:10:31 AM PST by tuliptree76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Has Nutty-Fi mentioned why we would need two houses in the legislature any longer?


15 posted on 02/13/2005 8:10:51 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Now, that's a scary thought. Killer wattles.


16 posted on 02/13/2005 8:11:06 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
but more important, they CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO MODIFY OUR CONSTITUTION FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES!!!!

And that includes one to get Schwarzenegger elected President or any non-citizen.

17 posted on 02/13/2005 8:11:08 AM PST by stopem (Support the troops yellow ribbon purse-key-holders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: stopem

Wish there was an edit function, on my previous post above:

"non-citizen" should read as:

foreign born citizen.


18 posted on 02/13/2005 8:13:20 AM PST by stopem (Support the troops yellow ribbon purse-key-holders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
And even if they did, an amendment would have to be ratified by 3/4 of the states, including many small ones. Does she really think they would vote to diminish their power in national elections?

Really?

I wish I had the time to study and compile all the significant changes that have been made in the 20th Century that circumvented the Constitutional Amendment requirement.

Why should they stop now?

Just have a court declare it "Constitutional".

19 posted on 02/13/2005 8:14:16 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Not even that. It is a small number of mega-cities in the Northeast, Midwest, and West Coast that are overwhelmingly Democrat.

And they still haven't figured out that they would all last less than a month without the products of the "Red" states.
Literally.

They would starve in the dark.

20 posted on 02/13/2005 8:16:51 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson