Posted on 02/13/2005 2:00:25 AM PST by The_Liberal Person
Well, even better idea: A good portion of liberals scream that they want to dispossess the wealthy.
So the wealthy libs should be dispossessed, and their wealth evenly distributed to ship libs out of the country.
In this way the Liberal mantra of 'distributing wealth' is realized so they're happy, and the libs get shipped to whatever place they choose and we're happy.
Yes, I want you to leave - Canada comes to mind.
When I think it has gone too far right.
No - you emigrate like those before you who "fled political oppression" /snicker.
Answer to Question # 4 - No, you will pay for your own plane ticket out.
Answer to Questions # 1, 2 & 3 - Our goal is that no one will be left in the country who will ever again ask the question, "Is the Government going to pay for my _________?"
(You fill in the blank.)
thanks for the information. I stand corrected and heartily agree with our founders intent. I think that we should go back to that approach.
I was a single parent household with young 3 kids. I worked full time, got an engineering degree without child support or government handouts. And I'm by far not a genious. I'm just your average American. It can be done if you are willing to WORK HARD to improve your own situation, or you can wallow in missery, whoa is me. I took control.
We already pay for public schools. Isn't if funny when the average price per student in public schools is somewhere around the neighboorhood of 8-9 thousand per student, yet, you can put your child in a good private school for less than half of that. If all schools were privatized, and our money returned to us, all parents afford to send their kids to a private school with money left over for a decent education, not some liberal indoctrination camp. And, that savings would be passed on to renters in the form of lower rents since the landlord would have less of a tax burden. Or, you could homeschool your kids.
Silly; it doesn't count their OWN money. They only want to dispossess other people's money.
I was thinking, that the biggest problem would be fraud and fake requests for help to leave or return after leaving for more money.
On a one time basis, we could insert a biometric device that would sense attempted returns and limit mobility in a variety of ways.
I would be willing to do this, but only for the less fortunate.
Alec Baldwin, I believe.
To crush the Democrats, to drive them before us, to hear the lamentations of their women!
2. Is your goal to make Liberals to leave America?
No! You shall all be conscripted into the legions of The Great Strategerist Chimpus Khan!
3. If you want us to stay, when does this country go too far to the right?
You make a meaningless noise.
4. If you want us to leave, will the US government pay for our plane tickets?
After you are slaughtered in battle like the cannonfodder you are, we will pay the airfreight for your coffins. We are compassionate conservatives.
---
This-Is-Not-A-Ping-List ping!
[Freepmail me to get on or off this Not-A-Ping-List.]
The guy who wanted to stone Henry Hyde's family.
YOU mean actually follow the constitution as designed??? Nah, wouldnt work. You liberals dont believe in the constitution.
I know.
Which is the beauty of the idea.
If the wealthy libs get dispossessed, they'd scream like banshees about it, and massive chaos would break out in the Dem party.
(Beyond and above what already is the rule.)
There are two wealthy Sinaors from Taxachussetts that I can think of who'd be screaming the loudest..
In response to reply #212:
Poverty? When most of the "poor" here in America have cable TV, Air conditioning, access to the best hospitals in the world (even if only via emergency rooms), food stamps, cash payments from the gov't, taxpayer-supported education, the availability of college scholarships, social security, etc, I doubt we could consider that poverty the same way a young person in Calcutta would.
If you define poverty as not having a BMW in the driveway of your 4 bedroom home in the ritzy suburb of your choice, then you have a skewed notion of what poverty is. The problem is that you believe that people should have these things given to them, because they're probably too stupid to get it on their own, rather than demanding that everyone work to achieve that standard individually.
Instead of believing that human beings are basically hapless, why don;t you ever think about the notion that perhaps they all have some capacity for success? You dont because to do so would endanger the rest of your utopian ideals.
I repeat; grow up.
Tee hee! Hope its not too late!
possibly the best succinct dismissive slam I have read in the last year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.