Strange, then why are we alleged "materialists" the ones posting tons of evidence on these threads and encouraging others to have a look, and it's the *anti*evolutionists who keep refusing to follow where it leads, and trying to hand-wave away the evidence because it's not "really" evidence, it's "disciplines that may be employed to interpret evidence in such a way as to fit a priori views", or frantically saying "claiming piles of evidence doesn't make it so", or it's "simply twisted logic/interpretation of physical entities", blah blah blah...
To the anti-evolutionists, it's just one big game of making excuses to say, "don't confuse me with the facts", and encouraging others to "pay no attention to the evidence, it means nothing..."
