Why couldn't one like this be posted, which depicts more of her real beauty...and class.
Posted on 02/10/2005 9:40:34 AM PST by nuconvert
She was born in 1947.
She's a bit too old for children. (without a lot of medical intervention)
Good!
Allright you guys. You are posting these pics of the blond Norwegian Princess with her boobs hanging out. Here are two extraordinarily lovely ladies who are both intelligent, classy and bruntte, even without boobs hanging out! Click on the second picture and tell me they aren't just as lovely as Priness Medeleine. Even the (eek!) OLDER one.
"http://www.hellomagazine.com/profiles/charlottecasiraghi/?view=gallery"
Why couldn't one like this be posted, which depicts more of her real beauty...and class.
She does fill out that tiara well, doesn't she?
Oh, my goodness!
I guess there is some advantage to those long nights in the Swedish winters.
**double sigh**
"George Bush should make Congress appoint Arnold Schwarzenegger as his successor."
I live in Caleeefornia. If He is elected, I will have to move back to Scotland.
>Yeah, that's kind of what the "love is truly blind" saying is all about isn't it??
I think the "love is blind" is because said in the first throes of love we tend to endow our beloved with all sorts of good qualities which few can live up to. LOL!!
>I thought Diana was a gorgeous creature but not a person I liked. She ws exhibitionistic, immature, self centered and immensely determined to destroy that family<
With all due respect, cajun, I couldn't disagree with you more. Diana was a teenager when she married Charles, and I think quite smitten with him. At first she was unsure of herself. To Charles (and perhaps even the Queen) she was but a brood mare for the throne. Her marriage was a tragedy from the very beginning. However, she eventually became a charming and poised philanthropist in spite of it. Anything she may have done behind the scenes was her desperate way of coping with a very unhappy situation all around. IMHO she meant no harm to the royal family, and was a loving mother to her sons.
It is always tempting to impute
unlikely virtues to the cute
- P J O'Rourke
And you are a pietistic pissant that can't beyond the humor of the situation.
FO Ahole
LOL.
My husband says "cute" makes up for a good 15 points on the IQ test.
I agree. I figured these people got the nickname "the horsey set" from their looks...
Yeah, well, after Henry VIII no royal ever would consider divorce either....the times they are a changin'!!
Since they are accepting divorce and the married/divorced mistress as consort, it is time to consider accepting abdication as well.
Charles should finally marry the woman he has always loved. But, because they both are adulterers, neither should hold the title, "Royal Highness". They have hurt so many people, and thus are very "low" indeed. Charles should never ascend to the throne.
Diana was handed a very unfortunate hand, for a teenager to deal with. It is true that she knew about Charle's love for Camilla when she married him...but, she was very young and believed that he would change...
But, too bad. Happens to millions of women. At least she had the love of most of the world, two wonderful sons, as well as riches and beauty. It is sad that she did not have a good marriage. Not many do. She could have made the best of the good she did have. She could have really made a huge difference in the world.
It is a shame that instead she chose to inflict the same pain on other women, that Camilla inflicted on her. I ceased to feel any pity for the woman after it came out that she destroyed other homes, by having affairs with married men. She shamed herself and hurt her children.
The only way Charles can be KING is if Camilla's ex-husband dies before they get married. To be KING you can't marry any divorced women. Catholic woman are also out of the picture if Charles is to be KING.
Charles will never be KING.
Line of Succession List below:
Roman Catholics or those married to Roman Catholics are automatically excluded.
In the top 52...
(DOB)
1. HRH The Prince Charles, The Prince of Wales (1948)marriage to a devoiced women.
2. HRH Prince William of Wales, eldest son of The Prince Charles (1982)
3. HRH Prince Henry of Wales, younger son of The Prince Charles (1984)
4. HRH The Prince Andrew, The Duke of York, second son of HM Queen Elizabeth II (1960)
5. HRH Princess Beatrice of York, elder daughter of The Prince Andrew (1988)
20. Lady Davina Windsor (1977), daughter of Richard, Duke of Gloucester
21. Lady Rose Windsor (1980), daughter of Richard, Duke of Gloucester
22. HRH Prince Edward, Duke of Kent (1935), son of George, Duke of Kent
George Windsor, The Earl of St. Andrews (excluded himself from succession by marrying a Roman Catholic)
Edward Windsor, Baron Downpatrick (1988), son of George, Earl of St Andrews - excluded himself by becoming a Roman Catholic
23. Lady Marina Charlotte Windsor (1992), daughter of George, Earl of St Andrews
24. Lady Amelia Windsor (1995), daughter of George, Earl of St Andrews
Lord Nicholas Windsor (1970), son of Edward, Duke of Kent (excluded himself by becoming a Roman Catholic)
I doubt it. If Camilla had been the first wife, she would probably have symbolized whatever Diana as the first wife symbolized that irritated him at the time. He would probably have treated her just the same as he did Diana and with someone else to boot. On the other hand, if he was "in love" with Camilla in the first place, why in the world didn't he marry HER before she and he both were married to someone else? I've read somewhere that Camilla actually suggested his marriage to someone else rather than her even when they were both available for some reason. Perhaps she just enjoyed watching him flail about and then stealing him from another woman. That said, shall we never mention them again? Perhaps they richly deserve each other.
As an outsider, I see them as adulterers. Oops! Mum's the word!
You are so wrong!
The Habsburg monarchy had a long relationship with the Roman Catholic Church.
As the political descendant of the Holy Roman Empire, the Habsburg monarchy had dual responsibilities for its subjects’ spiritual and temporal welfare.
In this context, the Austro-Hungarian monarch was head of both the State and Church; however, it must be noted that although the Habsburg emperors were Apostolic Majesties mandated to spread the Catholic faith and foster the Church’s welfare, they were also tolerant of non-Catholic faiths found in their empire.
(Mary, Queen of Scots) 1542 - 1587
Last Roman Catholic monarch of Scotland.
How about Spainish this 1928 One peseta Spanish postage stamp Pius XI and Alfonso XIII
Alfonso XII of Spain (November 28, 1857 - November 25, 1885), was king of Spain, reigning from 1875 to 1885, after a coup d'etat restored the monarchy and ended the ephemeral First Spanish Republic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.