Skip to comments.
Scientists find missing link between whale and its closest relative, the hippo
UC Berkeley News ^
| 24 January 2005
| Robert Sanders, Media Relations
Posted on 02/08/2005 3:50:43 AM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700, 701-720, 721-740 ... 2,241-2,242 next last
To: shubi
Where is the conscience of creationists when they attack evolution with no facts? Where is their conscience when they offer no science to refute evolution, yet claim their view superior?
Where is the conscience of creationists when they alter scientists quotes?
Where is the conscience of creationists when they preach cultish heresy and conflate the Gospel and Genesis as needed for salvation?
I wouldn't put much stock in the conscience idea if I were you.
If I've done any of those things let me know - I can't speak for anyone else. I know that you and I don't feel the same way about God. That's fine. I have personal reasons and have witnessed some things that are partly responsible for my beliefs. I'm not a nut and I'm not out to get anyone. In fact the Bible teaches that we're supposed to try to bring people to Christ. It goes on to say that if the would be convert refuses twice we're to leave them alone. That's it. What's so threatening about that?
701
posted on
02/08/2005 5:23:12 PM PST
by
Jaysun
(Nefarious deeds for hire.)
To: UltraKonservativen
I was involved in the engineering for our second flight to the moon.We went to the moon based on proven mathematics and proven laws of physics. That's not strictly true. By which I mean (especially when speaking to someone who demands absolute proof) that it's not true at all.
The mathematics were approximations, taking into account the gravitational influences of only a few of the many bodies in the solar system, but good enough, and underlying them was Newtonian dynamics, which is a false and superseded theory, but again good enough for the purposes.
702
posted on
02/08/2005 5:24:31 PM PST
by
Stultis
To: muir_redwoods
If you spelled it right, not in my dictionary. Tell me what you think Pakicetus means.
To: UltraKonservativen
I was involved in the engineering for our second flight to the moon.Clarify. Kerry was in Cambodia.
704
posted on
02/08/2005 5:25:14 PM PST
by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
To: Stultis
Proof is therefore impossible with respect to postulates about the natural world.
Wow, that's far out.
So Newton's laws, Laws of Thermodynamics, Ohm's law and many other "LAWS" are not PROOFS OF THE NATURAL WORLD? Yet they all started as postulates and were proven mathematically.
I guess with such convoluted thinking about the difference between NATURAL SCIENCE and UN-NATURAL(?)SCIENCE, the proof of evolution as a fact is seen as absolute.
Good luck, Buddy.
To: HankReardon
Try google. It is your friend
To: Stultis
I never followed Ellen G. White, she was not a fundamentalist, she was a cultist.
707
posted on
02/08/2005 5:29:24 PM PST
by
RaceBannon
((Prov 28:1 KJV) The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.)
To: VadeRetro
... there are still apes today ... But why? Gotcha, huh?
</creationism mode>
708
posted on
02/08/2005 5:30:41 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: WildTurkey
Probably the same place it is when they alter our posts. Had another creationist excuse bearing false witness because he was a soldier of God.Really? They invoked the Muslim defense???
709
posted on
02/08/2005 5:31:25 PM PST
by
jennyp
(WHAT I'M READING NOW: Professional NT Services by Miller)
To: WildTurkey
Please go reread Evolution 101.
I lost my only copy. Does it argue that everything has been evolving backwards? By definition to evolve is to develop or achieve something better than before (hence the idea that to evolve is to take a step up). Do you just enjoy arguing?
710
posted on
02/08/2005 5:32:39 PM PST
by
Jaysun
(Nefarious deeds for hire.)
To: garybob
"One of the most difficult problems facing those who accept the naturalistic origin of life"
Evolution does not speculate on the origin of life, so I guess that point is moot.
711
posted on
02/08/2005 5:32:57 PM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: jennyp
Really? They invoked the Muslim defense??? I think they modified it later to "Christian Soldier".
712
posted on
02/08/2005 5:34:13 PM PST
by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
To: Jaysun
I lost my only copy. Does it argue that everything has been evolving backwards? By definition to evolve is to develop or achieve something better than before (hence the idea that to evolve is to take a step up). Do you just enjoy arguing?Then I suggest you get another copy and then come back and try to discuss evolution.
713
posted on
02/08/2005 5:35:22 PM PST
by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
To: Theo
"who casually dismiss anti-evolutionist scientists "
There is no such thing.
714
posted on
02/08/2005 5:35:40 PM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: shubi
No, God didn't design the human eye. It evolved. No Almighty God would have been so stupid as to come up with this design. I've noticed that many people's belief in evolution stems from their hatred toward God....
715
posted on
02/08/2005 5:35:43 PM PST
by
Theo
To: Jaysun
Do you just enjoy arguing? No. Do you enjoy misquoting evolutionary theory?
716
posted on
02/08/2005 5:36:58 PM PST
by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
To: Theo
I've noticed that many people's belief in evolution stems from their hatred toward God.... Where did you notice that. In thousands of posts here I have not seen that a single time.
717
posted on
02/08/2005 5:37:47 PM PST
by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
To: SubSailor
I can't tell you how much contempt I have for creationists. If a little comes through TOUGH!
718
posted on
02/08/2005 5:38:05 PM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: UltraKonservativen
So Newton's laws, Laws of Thermodynamics, Ohm's law and many other "LAWS" are not PROOFS OF THE NATURAL WORLD? Yet they all started as postulates and were proven mathematically. As you were previously informed, Newton's laws are outmoded.
719
posted on
02/08/2005 5:39:14 PM PST
by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
To: PatrickHenry
One thing is certain....
The third human to be born, came from the first two...
720
posted on
02/08/2005 5:39:15 PM PST
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700, 701-720, 721-740 ... 2,241-2,242 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson