Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SoCal's report card not golden
s.g. tribune ^ | 2/3/2005 | Kerry Cavanaugh, Staff writer

Posted on 02/04/2005 2:47:02 PM PST by television is just wrong

SoCal's report card not golden

By Kerry Cavanaugh, Staff Writer

With soaring housing costs, bad schools, horrendous traffic jams and a dearth of well-paying jobs, Southern California's once-golden lifestyle continues to dim, a scorecard released Thursday by the regional planning agency shows.

The seventh annual State of the Region report by the Southern California Association of Governments ranks the quality of life in the region as a D-plus --potentially failing.

Housing and air quality worsened in 2003, while the grades for traffic, education, household income and public safety remained static. And while the number of jobs in the six-county region rose by 14,000, personal income for its 17.7 million residents stayed flat.

"The fundamental issue this region faces ... is the income issue. Without an increase in wages and per capita income we're not going to have the resources to deal with these issues," said Mark Pisano, executive director of SCAG.

The report details a slate of interconnected problems plaguing Southern California.

Students perform below the national median on reading and math test scores, while 76 percent of residents do not have a college degree -- elements that limit their ability to get high-paying jobs.

Meanwhile, an exodus of well-paying manufacturing jobs to less-expensive areas have been replaced by lower-paying service jobs. With less wealth, residents have to travel to far-flung suburbs to be able to afford a home, which then worsens congestion and pollution.

"How do you get out of this Catch-22?" asked Los Angeles County Supervisor Yvonne Burke. "We need better schools (in urban areas) so people won't have to move so far away and housing people can afford so they don't have to move so far away."

Southern California's housing earned a D: the worst score since the SCAG report card was launched.

The value of construction permits hit $15.5 billion in 2003, but still didn't keep up with growth and demand. From 2000-03, the region issued 200,000 building permits, but the population grew by 1 million.

That led to dramatic increases in the cost of housing, with prices jumping up to 30 percent in 2003. The median price at the end of that year was $417,500, according to the California Association of Realtors, and had soared to $474,480 by December 2004.

Only 26 percent of households in Los Angeles and 20 percent of households in Orange County could afford a median-priced home in 2003. Even the Inland Empire became more pricey, with only 38 percent of households able to buy a median-priced home compared with 43 percent in 2002.

"The issue of housing affordability, availability and accessibility goes to the core of our long-term economic health and quality of life," said Toni Young, who sits on the Port Hueneme City Council and is SCAG's first vice president.

"Virtually nothing is more sacred than the home, which in Southern California, is becoming more and more difficult to attain each year."

SCAG officials said they are trying to tackle housing and related issues of traffic and air quality with the "2 percent strategy" -- a planning vision adopted last year that calls for more condominiums, townhouses and denser development close to transit lines.

analyzing development opportunity along major bus and train corridors, SCAG officials estimate they could build 400,000 more units.

Their goal is to move jobs closer to homes and homes closer to jobs. So far the cities of Ontario, South Pasadena and communities along the Gold Line have expressed interest in adopting that plan, Pisano said.

-- Kerry Cavanaugh can be reached at (818) 713-3746 or by e-mail at kerry.cavanaugh@dailynews.com


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; goldenstate; illegalimmigration; quality; traffic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Plutarch

Thanks for the excerpt. As a quantitative type I do appreciate the numbers. As a life long resident, I can remember what things were like when the population was under 20 million. Now the number is about 38 million. It is crowded (by my tastes), and I hope we don't love the place to death.


21 posted on 02/04/2005 3:48:12 PM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

yes. yes. i. i . i. i. i. live in the... a little oasis in los agneles, where it's full... wealthy liberals, and green trees from latino migrant, but even here it's, like, hard ... yu know. ok butg if u go out of the "oasis" of beverly higlls etc. it's rather difficult to live, WHy?


22 posted on 02/04/2005 3:48:47 PM PST by hasegawasama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ

Tejas is fine, if you like hot weather in summer and snow in winter. I am taking my kids on a trip to Colorado this summer.


23 posted on 02/04/2005 3:49:24 PM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Yes, but you can see flowers and do some outdoor BBQ during winter, or so I'm told fairly frequently.
My freesia and star jasmine are blooming (and enchanting me). Grilled rib-eyes are planned for Sunday. (Other bonuses include palm trees framing a view of snow-capped mountains, the Getty, and In 'N Out Burger.)
 
It's still worth it. But, sometimes, barely.

24 posted on 02/04/2005 3:51:54 PM PST by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
Plutarch said:

All of these “interconnected” problems all at once! The report doesn’t state why this is happening to Southern California specifically. I wonder if there is some factor not mentioned in the report?

Plutarch, I just LOVED your "picture is a thousand words" response. LOL!

25 posted on 02/04/2005 3:55:46 PM PST by sauron ("Truth is hate to those who hate Truth" --unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RKV
Tejas is fine, if you like hot weather in summer and snow in winter.
I don't. Not particularly. But I do love Austin, and I'd love to be "Texan, by choice". It's the only place that lures me beyond SoCal's west side.
 
*sigh*

26 posted on 02/04/2005 3:56:07 PM PST by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
California used to be a hellava' place to live. I have relatives that have seen the hand writing on the wall and left or sold their overpriced homes at a handsome profit and found cheaper digs east.
27 posted on 02/04/2005 3:57:29 PM PST by oyez (¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
Cannot go to the beaches anymore, crime is too high, gangs run rampant, and with Special order #40 thanks to Los Angeles City council, Immigration haven it is.

This is spreading throughout the nation. America is due to become a third world nation. It is impossible to stop since our politicians lack spine to defend our founding principles.

Simple formula: Fewer and fewer taxpayers + larger and larger numbers of nontaxpayers = regression into third world status.

28 posted on 02/04/2005 3:58:36 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ

What that verse? "That's right, you're not from Texas, but you welcome just the same".


29 posted on 02/04/2005 3:59:43 PM PST by oyez (¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ

You might like Colorado Springs. I have spent quite a bit of time there on business. A view of the front range makes up for the snowy winter IMHO. It won't have the nightlife of Austin, but then you might learn to like fishing and shooting.


30 posted on 02/04/2005 4:00:33 PM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ
I was born in Glendale, lived there for years and in northern California for longer. I returned there to attend USC.

Southern California is special, but conditions (not the weather) have changed in the past couple of decades. You can never return to the past, but you can have valid concerns about the future.

I can never return there. I'd have to give up too much of a chunk of my net worth just to get housing.

31 posted on 02/04/2005 4:01:58 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RKV
I lived in the foothills of the Rockies, in Canada, for five years. Been there, ain't doin' that E.V.E.R. again.
 
= )
 
I've seen palm trees in Austin, they're my one geographical requirement.

32 posted on 02/04/2005 4:04:13 PM PST by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Dude, you have the FUNNIEST page. LMAO.
33 posted on 02/04/2005 4:04:54 PM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I've lived all over the darned place (and by "all" I include four continents), and this is the longest I've lived anywhere. All my children were born here, and I crave roots, a foundation, "home", and I thought this was it. Unfortunately I also crave an attic, so I've been putting it out to the Big Guy that I'd like to have it, even if it ain't here.
 
Still waiting for a sign...

34 posted on 02/04/2005 4:09:07 PM PST by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RKV
It is crowded (by my tastes), and I hope we don't love the place to death.

From the Report:

As to the sources of population growth, 48 percent was due to natural increase, an estimated 41 percent from foreign-immigration, and 11 percent from domestic immigration.

According to the Report, if it is too crowded, only 11% is due to “we” loving it too much by migrating from the U.S. The growth is from foreign-immigration and their subsequent fecundity.

35 posted on 02/04/2005 4:10:16 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
WRONG! California was a SWING STATE, electing both Democrats and Republicans. The outflow of conservative Anglos has left liberal whites (the bay area), Asians, and Latinos. Even the blacks are moving to Las Vegas or the Southeast.

The Central Valley, Orange County and San Diego County remain Republican, though. The odd thing is, the Central Valley is more Latino than the Bay area, although it is also more Republican. A dirty secret about California politics is that Latinos do not vote in as large margins as whites or Asians.

36 posted on 02/04/2005 4:12:20 PM PST by Clemenza (I Am Here to Chew Bubblegum and Kick Ass, and I'm ALL OUT OF BUBBLEGUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

The ranking of schools in California of the other 50 states, last I heard was #49. Now that's something to talk about. (sarcasm)


37 posted on 02/04/2005 4:15:55 PM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Every state is a swing state by that definition. We even elect some Democrats to Congress here in Texas.


38 posted on 02/04/2005 4:17:40 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Depends. I tend to define a swing state as a place with regular changes in the state legislature, regular shifts in Senate and Presidential elections, and registration more or less evenly divided. Missouri and Florida are currently "swing states" by my definition. My home state of New York, which has a long history of alternating between RINO and Dem-Socialist governors, cannot be considered a swing state because 1. Margins of victory for Dem politicians are usually considerable. 2. Dems outnumber Republicans by a wide margin and 3. the only Pubbies who get elected in New York are those who govern like Democrats.

New York State Politics in a Nutshell: Republicans = Democrats, Democrats = Socialists.

39 posted on 02/04/2005 4:21:36 PM PST by Clemenza (I Am Here to Chew Bubblegum and Kick Ass, and I'm ALL OUT OF BUBBLEGUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Yes, but we are a blue state. went to Mr. kerry with electorates. Hope it changes soon. I am ashamed. I do realize when you get away from the coast and out of L.A. county it is Republican. But we still ended up a Blue state


40 posted on 02/04/2005 4:21:50 PM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson