Why shouldn't she accept it? Why aren't you accepting it? Understanding that some legwork went into the timing and location of their introduction does nothing the cheapen the moment or assault the genuineness of her emotion. There's absolutely nothing wrong with accepting the truth behind what happened.
Not assuming they were props, props have no choices to make in how they behave on camera, these people had choices and they made the right choice, the human choice. And I for one am glad it happened the way it did. It provided an moving and wonderful moment in a powerful SOTU, and there's nothing wrong with putting a little work into making those moments.
>>Why shouldn't she accept it? Why aren't you accepting it? Understanding that some legwork went into the timing and location of their introduction does nothing the cheapen the moment or assault the genuineness of her emotion. There's absolutely nothing wrong with accepting the truth behind what happened.
Not assuming they were props, props have no choices to make in how they behave <<<
listen tv land trivia man, i could care less about your self proclaimed inside knowledge of tv land ok? so stop repeating yourself.
and yes, you have said these people were used as props. you didn't use the word, but you have described it over and over as just that.. that they were PLACED there for a specific purpose or outcome for the benifit of tv land. you have said that repeatedly
and i repeat - YOU don't KNOW that as a fact or TRUTH. you can go on and on and on proclaiming all your knowledge - but you are still just suppositioning. you are like someone who finds a rock on the ground and then goes into lengthy oratory of how it had to have fell from the sky because you are a expert on sky-rock trivia. i have never said you are wrong - because i don't know. but guess what? neither do you.
and you are wrong about how most Marine mothers would feel about being used for a tv prop. and that's my field of expertise. you are truly full of yourself if you think i MUST except your guess work because you are a self-proclaimed tv land trivia expert. just as i would listen to the rock-from-the-sky expert and perhaps find some merit to his theory - i sure as heck don't HAVE to believe he correct or that there is not a more simplistic and innocent explaination for the rock being on the ground. got that?
and now i see you have tried that old sorry lie/myth that the SP Marine Flag raising was staged also. i also see some very sharp INFORMED ladies have proved you wrong. but you won't admit you were wrong or even might have been wrong.
why don't you just admit that the seating chart the night of the SOTU speech could possibly have been made with no other motive than they were honored guests? period? that it's a possibility that NO ONE ever thought "oh yeah, this might make for some great tv moment"?
that scenerio is every bit as possible as the one you have stated repeatedly. just because you believe it doesn't make it a fact nor a truth. nor MUST i believe your supposition as FACT.