Gingrich predicted that Pelosi's remarks would be used by America's enemies as a propaganda tool. Newt should just come out and say it:
Pelosi and her ilk are the enemy!
1 posted on
02/02/2005 5:19:38 PM PST by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: wagglebee
I hope before she says it tonight that she will withdraw that phrase and does not use it tonight,I pray she doesn't!
2 posted on
02/02/2005 5:21:59 PM PST by
lizma
To: wagglebee
Let her use it. Gives Rush more ammo, like he needs more when taking dowm dems, but let her open her trash mouth.
3 posted on
02/02/2005 5:22:03 PM PST by
b4its2late
(The Lord made man before woman to give him time to think of an answer for her first question.)
To: wagglebee
4 posted on
02/02/2005 5:22:13 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(Big government is still a big problem.)
To: wagglebee
Nancy, don't change. I want the Democratic Party dead. Thank you for sharing the same goal.
5 posted on
02/02/2005 5:22:56 PM PST by
Tribune7
To: wagglebee
I hope she uses that phrase.
Pelosi, Kennedy and Dean today's democratic leaders, helping to ensure a Republican Congress, Senate and President.
6 posted on
02/02/2005 5:23:44 PM PST by
Michael.SF.
("One day Pilgrim, there will be a knock on the door...." - Paul Lazarro)
To: Howlin
See what I mean? I wonder if she'll go through with it....
To: wagglebee
Newt, the Freepers are right and you're wrong. Let the Democrats rip their disguises off and show the country just who they are.
8 posted on
02/02/2005 5:26:02 PM PST by
Uncle Fud
To: wagglebee
But the term "occupying force" fits Democratic sensibilities just fine. I think it reflects the fact that national Democrats are desparate to hold on to the left wing voter. Everything they've done lately seems to be aimed to please the political Left.
It's noteworthy that Iraqi political figures have expressed that they want the "occupying force" - liberating force would be a better term - to stay.
To: wagglebee
Newt should just come out and say it: Pelosi and her ilk are the enemy! You've got that right. She's a Socialist pig and a traitor to the bone!!!
10 posted on
02/02/2005 5:29:00 PM PST by
NRA2BFree
(NO AMNESTY, NO UN, NO PC, NO BS, NO MSM, NO WHINY @SS LIBERAL BEDWETTERS, NO LIBERAL JUDGES! YEAH!)
To: wagglebee
I hope she does use that phrase.
Imagine how mothers, wives, and daughters are going feel after they hear Pelosi tell them their loved ones are part of an occupying force.
Aren't there any Democrats that know how to talk without their foot in their mouth?
11 posted on
02/02/2005 5:29:02 PM PST by
Noachian
(We're all one judge away from tyranny.)
To: wagglebee; All
"Pelosi and her ilk are the enemy"
Now you got it. Traitors are more like it.
The rats keep trying to pretend this is another Viet Nam. Well it isn't. Communism is a recognized cause,however evil. Terrorism is not. That makes many in the rat party pure and simple "traitors during time of war". It's OK with me if they are tried and jailed.
12 posted on
02/02/2005 5:30:00 PM PST by
rodguy911
(rodguy911:First Let's get rid of the UN and the ACLU,..toss in CAIR as well.)
To: wagglebee
Why is it that only Newt and Zell are willing to call the Democrats on their treasonous conduct ?
The silence from the Republican side sends a clear message to the terrorists.
And a clear message to the base.
To: wagglebee
Hey Newt! SHUTUP! The Beast is not dead yet.
To: wagglebee
Nancy practicing her rebuttal to the Presidents State of the Union.
16 posted on
02/02/2005 5:33:11 PM PST by
carlr
To: wagglebee
Looks like the takeover of the Dean wing is complete.
To: wagglebee
The Iraqi people ignored the terrorist threats; they can easily ignore idiot Democrats. If nothing else, the Iraqi people will be prepared to ignore their own version of a future Democratic party.
To: wagglebee
She's just parroting Ted Kennedy. All the radical, leftist freaks actually believe their own delusions.
They're slipping more and more into hysteria.
21 posted on
02/02/2005 5:37:16 PM PST by
Bullish
To: wagglebee
It would be interesting to note how the courts would construe the ' aid and comfort ' clause in the treason portion of the Constitution?
A quick definition from www.lectlaw.com says about this clause:
"AID AND COMFORT - The U.S. Constitution, Article VIII, Section III, declares, that adhering to the enemies of the United States, giving them aid and comfort, shall be treason. These words, as they are to be understood in the constitution, have not received a full judicial construction. They import, however, help, support, assistance, countenance, encouragement. The word aid is explained by Lord Coke as comprehending all persons counselling, abetting, plotting, assenting, consenting, and encouraging to do the act, (and he adds, though not applicable to treason; who are not present when the act is done)."
To: wagglebee; All
All of you who are wishing she would say it for political reasons are forgetting that it could cost American lives. Even Hannity said he was not going to mention it anymore so she would say it and look foolish. Who's looking foolish here?
24 posted on
02/02/2005 5:40:31 PM PST by
groanup
(http://www.fairtax.org)
To: wagglebee
If anyone is an "occupying force" in this country it's the DimoWits and their occupation of any empty-headed, shallow or still-formative wo/man-child that's willing to swallow their tripe.
26 posted on
02/02/2005 5:43:40 PM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson