Absolutely! He's got motive and opportunity, and now the means. It's been a crime in the making for a very long time. It even has judicial approval. Why the court can't see it for the attempted murder that it is is beyond me. How does one go about charging a man with attempted murder in a place where his concubine's mother worked for the sheriff before her death six months ago? How can we get the system to work for Terri? What the hell are we doing wrong that this seems to have no reversal?
I did like the attorney with Terri's brother. Well-spoken and authoritative. He just might get something done, such as get the doctors to present their opinions again.
He said that she has never had any legal representation, never had her day in court.
Greta and others don't ask Felos enough pointed, hard questions. They never, that I've seen, corner Michael on his malpractice testimony. Nobody ever uses clips of other interviews. If I were Terri's lawyer, I would demand that previous testimony and these tapes be entered into evidence.
I have a question, though, if there is no law allowing Terri's tube to be removed, what code is the judge basing his verdict on?