Greedhead alert. SHAME on them.
1 posted on
01/31/2005 7:41:53 AM PST by
pabianice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: pabianice
Model Railroading hobbyists have run into the same thing with the Union Pacific, which is now demanding a fee from model companies in order to reproduce their logo.
50 posted on
01/31/2005 8:42:08 AM PST by
HolgerDansk
("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round.)
To: pabianice
I don't see how they can get away with this, since it is not generally their intellectual property. Most of these items have been designed at the behest of the U.S. Military and paid for by the U.S. taxpayers.
To: pabianice
Anbd another childhood hobby shot to hell.
To: pabianice
A personal observation:
Had it not been for my love of model airplanes and tanks as a kid, I seriously doubt I ever would have gotten two engineering degrees and gone on to work for the defense industry (or the military, for that matter).
I thought there was a practical limit to my opinion of "suits". Speaking as a former kid and current father of a son, a pox on these blood sucking worms.
63 posted on
01/31/2005 8:57:18 AM PST by
LTCJ
To: pabianice
Oh, fudge. This is going to impact the tabletop gaming community like no one's busines..
65 posted on
01/31/2005 8:57:41 AM PST by
Junior
(FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
To: pabianice
YAAAGGGHHHH!
I'd better get my Peleliu model quick!
69 posted on
01/31/2005 9:03:45 AM PST by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save bucks and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
To: SAMWolf; Darksheare; msdrby
Bloody hell. Now what's Spiderboy going to blow up in a few years?
71 posted on
01/31/2005 9:05:20 AM PST by
Professional Engineer
(Caution this poster contains 39 Transistors, 78 diodes, and 1776 blown capacitors.)
To: pabianice
Using copyrights to screw the producers and consumers, I see they are taking a page from the MPAA/RIAA. And since OUR taxes dollars paid for the real vehicles, I think they owe us a refund.
By the way, I personally collect and build models myself, mainly sci-fi imports (Bandai Gundam) model kits, and I also think this is both extortion and a ripoff.
I think model kit makers will start moving factories to China over this.
To: pabianice
Well once these idiots are out of business they will sell the rights to someone that will again supply a demand. Just give it time.
85 posted on
01/31/2005 9:37:23 AM PST by
Fzob
(Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
To: pabianice
Nothing on the Revell site about it...they currently have 48 military model aircraft kits listed. See:
http://www.revell-monogram.com
Site may not be updated much tho., and there is no "latest news" section there either.
89 posted on
01/31/2005 9:50:49 AM PST by
Drago
To: pabianice
What about my "Monster model" kits? Are the studios going to want a royalty for a Frankenstein, Wolfman, or Dracula model?
94 posted on
01/31/2005 9:56:58 AM PST by
LetsRok
To: pabianice
Tell the greedheads that photos and drawings of their "intellectual property" will make them a lot more money of course newspapers, books etc. will all disappear too.
100 posted on
01/31/2005 10:02:26 AM PST by
fella
To: pabianice
Do you have the link to the original article?
101 posted on
01/31/2005 10:03:48 AM PST by
avg_freeper
(Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
To: Darth Reagan
106 posted on
01/31/2005 10:16:09 AM PST by
marblehead17
(I love it when a plan comes together.)
To: pabianice
This has been happening for some time. It is not something that is unexpectedly new. I collected model airplanes in the late 1950's to late 1960's. Many of the 1/72nd scale WWI and WWII fighters cost 49 cents. Midsized bombers cost 98 cents. Larger bombers were never over $2. Of course, the 1/48 scale were more. I could afford them on a weekly newspaper delivery boys salary.
When my kids were in their early teens, I wanted to introduce them to plastic models. I found that they were more expensive than what you would expect from inflation alone. That has been 10 years ago, but they basically priced themselves out of business. My kids were not interested.
I know that new moulds cost a lot more now, but most of what is being made is being made from the same moulds that were made 40 years ago. They should be paid for by now.
To: pabianice
The new U.S. Army Stryker armored vehicles are not available because of royalty requirements. And how much did the taxpayer pay in development cost? Our intellecutal property laws need reform.
To: Temple Owl
To: pabianice
But can we still get the glue? That's the best part about model building, IMHO. ;)
121 posted on
01/31/2005 11:15:08 AM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: pabianice
Such a sorry and wasteful loss to the children of today. For these shortsighted corporate lawyers to eliminate 'real-scale' models from our children's shelves is a travesty...
I've gone out of my way to try and purchase "REAL" toys not these strange bubble shaped plastic crap they have for kids today...
Time to buy up the old stock i guess!
123 posted on
01/31/2005 11:16:58 AM PST by
Barney59
(Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!)
To: pabianice
This is a cryin' frickin' shame! I'm starting to get my son (who prefers aircraft) interested in models, and now these b******s want royalties too boot!
I'll get him into armor (my preference) instead!
Cheers!
125 posted on
01/31/2005 11:19:21 AM PST by
SZonian
(44 years and counting.....can this finally be the year that a Championship finally comes home?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson