LOL! Thanks for that little barb. I needed a good chuckle. I do posess a sense of humor, and I tend to garble thoughts when I type something out and then attempt to revise it for clarity.
However, my point is that the story reveals that rather than engage in honest discussion about Dr. Meyer's arguement, the evolutionist community brands his ideas as "substandard science" and calls it "recycled material quite common in the intelligent design community". The statement "tottering house of ideological cards that is more about cherished mythology than honest intellectual endeavor" is backed up by the facts given in the full article. He is dismissed as a heretic, with no facts given to disprove his theory. He has been burned at the scientific stake for blasphemy.
Have you read his philosophy? His whole basis is that evolution does not fully explain the world therefore, since we can't explain it, God did it.
That is NOT science.
He doesn't have a theory. He has a hypothesis that says God did it. That cannot be proven or disproven.