[Ichneumon]

[Did you not understand what I was saying, or are you just having fun lying about it?]

Let me get your psychosis straight ... a "liar" is anyone who understands what you thought you wrote in the way you -- in your own mind -- demand it be understood?

Could you restate that in a manner more closely resembling cogent English? But since it's so bizarre, I'm going to have to go with an answer of "no, that's not what I said".

The only non-lie interpretation of your writing is that which you alone can make? That model of paranoid psychotic thinking is consistent with the body of your efforts here.

You're not making *any* sense...

You're going to feel *really* silly when you sober up and reread your post tomorrow.

(Can anyone else manage to parse this gibberish?)

Here's a restatement of what I said which seems to be giving you such difficulty, in a way that should be easy for you to grasp even in your intoxicated state:

You misrepresented what I had actually said (by yanking a tiny fragment of it out of context) and then "restated" it in an obnoxious, false manner. So naturally, I wanted to know whether your misrepresentation of my post was the result of a) an error on your part, or b) intentional dishonesty on your part.

Are we clear now, jerkwad?

[bvw]

Jerkwad, am I, eh? To a paranoid psychotic that might be so. And you are not the first paranoid psychotic in history to have gained a following. Your posse of chums is as quick as you are to resort to name-calling and ad-hominem derogation. They've learned from The Leader, the most most-evolved alpha-paranoid High Priest.