Ichneumon generally adds helpful links; and if you go onto his about page, has threads going back years in which he contributes quite detailed descriptions--whether cut'n'pasted, or painstakinly entered by him, I don't know.
Right Wing Professor often gets riled much more quickly; and his about page does not indicate that he is in fact a professor (as opposed to a Rush Limbaugh-esque "doctor of democracy").
I suspect part of the problem is that so many of the cre-ites (to coin a term; and I am not implying ALL, shall I just say, a disproportionate share compared to evo-ites)--do not seem to have systematic training in science, so that they are posing different questions than the ones scientists tend to ask, and ask them in vague terms, which are harder to answer mathematically.
Another difficulty is that many crevo-ites do not seem to keep up with where evolutionary theory actually is, and are debating ideas which the scientists hashed out among themselves long ago.
All of this can be quite maddening when you are confronted with the same thing "again, and Again, and AGAIN!" without even the chance to see (as you might if you were in a university setting, dealing with clueless students) their charges maturing and growing in knowledge and discipline.
Cheers!
But his "Contact" page does.