No, you do not.
because you're pal is a bigot.
Are you perhaps presuming that he is "my pal" because you have a prejudice that all who argue in favor of evolution must be part of some sort of social club?
Was metacognative "your pal" when he falsely accused Daniel Dennett of wanting to put Christians in concentration camps, when actually Dennett was saying that radical Islam may have to be contained in some way?
You're not innocent in this foodfight either. Go hug some puppies or something and then please resume when you're less in the mood to lash out and more in the mood to discuss issues. And yes, others on this thread would do well to take the same advice.
I prefer cats. But good advice is good advice, so I am outta here.
Certainly not, that would put me on your side of the argument. I think I've been pretty clear about my view that evolution is simply a mechanism that God uses.
Ichneumon, you entered the tete a tete defending WT. That was your choice, not mine. I learned my lesson a long time ago about jumping in between two adversaries, GeneralRe can attest to that.
Was metacognative "your pal" when he falsely accused Daniel Dennett of wanting to put Christians in concentration camps, when actually Dennett was saying that radical Islam may have to be contained in some way?
:-} Did I enter that fray on metacognitives side? No, but if I did I wouldn't be upset at you characterizing he or she as my pal for puposes of that tete a tete. I didn't so your argument and your analogy both fail.
You're not innocent in this foodfight either. Go hug some puppies or something and then please resume when you're less in the mood to lash out and more in the mood to discuss issues. And yes, others on this thread would do well to take the same advice.
LOL, you'll understand if we agree to disagree here.