[Right Wing Professor]

The fact that you can classify them militates against intermediacy.

Give me an example of something you can't classify.

Evolution's model would yield a mushy data set of animals that could only be called lifeforms, never even cats and dogs or animals and plants.

Why? Prove it.

Every archaeopteryx is an archaeopteryx, not something else.

So you think that if you name something, it removes the potential for it having a basic biological role?

[Ichneumon]

[Evolution's model would yield a mushy data set of animals that could only be called lifeforms, never even cats and dogs or animals and plants.]

Why? Prove it.

You didn't get an answer to this one, I note. I'd like to see one too, because on its face it seems transparently false and mindboggingly ignorant.