Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . .don't be shy.
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 01/26/2005 9:32:23 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
locked |
Posted on 01/26/2005 6:56:44 PM PST by Pikamax
Iran nears nuclear 'point of no return'
Ewen MacAskill, diplomatic editor Thursday January 27, 2005
Guardian
The Israeli defence minister, Shaul Mofaz, warned yesterday that Iran will reach "the point of no return" within the next 12 months in its covert attempt to secure a nuclear weapons capability. Tehran denies pursuing a nuclear weapons programme.
Speaking in London before a meeting today with Tony Blair, Lieutenant General Mofaz said Iran was the main long-term threat to the world and stressed that it will not be permitted to build a nuclear bomb. "None of the western countries can live with Iran having a nuclear capability," he told reporters.
Gen Mofaz, a hawk in the Israeli cabinet, who has said in the past that Israel has operational plans in place for a strike against Iranian nuclear facilities, refused to rule out military action.
Mr Blair, speaking in the Commons yesterday, said the Iranian issue was serious. Asked by the former Labour minister, Michael Meacher, to give an "unequivocal and categorical assurance" that Britain would not take part in any attack on Iran, Mr Blair said: "I know of no such contemplation by the United States of America."
In an interview with the Financial Times yesterday, Mr Blair refused to rule out the option of using military force.
With the US bogged down in the Iraq conflict, opening another front in Iran would be risky. Iran's Shebab-3 rockets are theoretically capable of hitting Israel.
The Israeli and US rhetoric has grown more strident in the last week and could be aimed at pushing Britain, France and Germany into taking a tougher diplomatic approach towards Iran.
The US vice-president, Dick Cheney, said last week that Israel might launch a pre-emptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, as it did against Iraq's nuclear reactor at Osirak in 1981.
Gen Mofaz indicated yesterday that he thought the US rather than Israel should do it: "It is the strongest power that can stop any nuclear power, especially in the hands of an extreme regime."
US officials have confirmed privately a report by the US reporter, Seymour Hersh, in the New Yorker, that US special forces have already been in Iran scouting out its nuclear facilities.
Gen Mofaz, who was born in Iran but left for Israel while a child, said: "Iran is very close to the point of no return, which means the enrichment of uranium, and we believe that the leadership of the US, together with the European countries, should stop as soon as possible this military nuclear programme in Iran."
He added that this point of no return would be reached "in less than a year" and that it would only be "a matter of years" after that that it would assemble the bomb .
The Israeli intelligence assessment, shared by the US and Britain, is that Iran could have a bomb by 2007.
The foreign secretary, Jack Straw, flew with his German and French counterparts to Tehran late in 2003 to broker a deal with Iran to suspend its enrichment programme. The deal broke down last year when the troika accused Iran of reneging on the deal. A new round of negotiations is under way and expected to drag on for at least a few months.
Like the US, which is equally sceptical, Israel is pushing for the issue to be referred to the United Nations for the imposition of sanctions and deep inspections by UN staff of Iran's nuclear facilities.
Gen Mofaz's comment about "point of no return" echoed a private briefing by Meir Dagan, the head of the Israeli overseas intelligence service, Mossad, to members of the Knesset on Monday. Mr Dagan said Mr Cheney's remark that Israel might make a pre-emptive strike was aimed at pressing Europe to adopt the tougher US approach towards Iran.
Britain, France and Germany have switched to a harder approach towards Iran. A confidential EU document leaked to Reuters and confirmed independently said the troika had told Iran it would be "unacceptable" for Tehran to keep its uranium enrichment programme, even if, as it claims, it is solely for civil purposes.
The commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard ground forces, Brigadier General Mohammad Ali Jafari, said yesterday: "Iran will retaliate against any stupid moves by Israel."
What is the world waiting for? Let's eliminate the threat now.
am i the only one he sees gurdian and think bla bla bla bla.
i didn't read the story, what did it say?
It said that Iran is nearing the point where we can't stop it from having nukes.
did someone ring the dinner bell for the kitties?
so what is your favorite kind of cat?
I don't think we have to worry about Iran. I'd guess that Israel will conduct a test of the bunkerbusters we sold them sometime after the Iraqi elections.
The U.S. of course will know nothing about the Israeli aircraft that refueled in Iraq on the way to Iran. No invasion. No foul.
I wouldn't be surprised if we happened to have a couple of carriers in the neighborhood to hammer anything if the Iranians got frisky near Iraq or the Straits of Hormuz. You got to love technology. That death from above stuff is hell.
Neo-crazies?
No, thanks. You need a better source.
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . .don't be shy.
Ho-Hum
They are watching you.....
They are floating on a sea of oil and need "peaceful" nuclear power? Can you explain why?
--Boris
TILT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1111944/posts
These publishers have asked us not to allow any material at all to be posted to FR:
altpressonline.com
americanpolitics.com
antiwar.com
snip
smite thee.
the troll...i mean poster only provided a link to the site, is that really outside the lines?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
