Your opinion, not hers. In anycase, in the scenerio she gets away with it. And the question really isn't about risk/reward ratios. It's about whether it's OK in the bizarre world of atheism.
Atheists are forced to admit that with no God, no heaven, no hell, no right, no wrong, she just becomes elements again and she enjoyed the money and what it bought.
So if you get away with either no uncomfortable consequences or acceptable consequences, it's the same in the end.
scenerio = scenario
> It's about whether it's OK in the bizarre world of atheism.
No, it's not. Why would you think it would be?
> So if you get away with either no uncomfortable consequences or acceptable consequences, it's the same in the end.
If you are a psycho, sure. But psycho morals ain;t mine, and hopefully they ain't yours.
Nope. You don't get to invoke facts that cannot be known until after the decision has been taken and acted upon to explain the motivations for the decision. The former cannot influence the latter, unless you have some way to cause information to flow backward in time.