Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic priests urge Church to reconsider celibacy rules
Australian Broadcasting Co. ^ | January 26, 2005 | Nick Grimm

Posted on 01/26/2005 8:45:26 AM PST by tvn

TONY EASTLEY: With their numbers in radical decline, Australia's Catholic Priests are urging the Vatican to overturn its ban on married clergy. The National Council of Priests has written to Rome urging it to re-consider the rules on celibacy. There's concern that sex and marriage have become an obstacle to recruitment.

Priests argue that their dwindling ranks could be boosted if they were allowed to marry and have families. Presently, only Priests who convert to Catholicism from other churches are allowed to be married.

The parish priest of Melbourne St Simon's Church, Father Martin Dixon, sits on the executive committee of the National Council of Priests.

AM's Nick Grimm spoke to Father Dixon.

MARTIN DIXON: Well, I think the issue of married Priests can be an issue that should be looked at and can be looked at. Marriage is not a bar to Priesthood, there are a large number of married men who are Priests in Australia already.

Melbourne has two of them here already, so it is happening, and I suppose we're saying, why just restrict it to particularly men who are Anglican Priests who have now become Catholics? It should be open to all men.

NICK GRIMM: The vow of celibacy has long been one of the defining features of the Catholic Priesthood though, hasn't it?

MARTIN DIXON: It has been, but it hasn't been for the whole history of the church. Half the history of the church has been married clergy, and the clergy in the beginning were married. Peter had his wife – the first Apostle. So, it's never been a restrictor for a long time within the church.

NICK GRIMM: So you would argue that this is a tradition which shouldn't be considered a sacred tradition?

MARTIN DIXON: No, I think it's one of the traditions we have to look at in the light of the present situation of the world we live in. It's not an unchangeable thing. The practice has been shown now that we can ordain married men. It therefore is not unchangeable.

NICK GRIMM: It is argued at times, isn't it, that there's a view that Priests can't really minister effectively if they live a life which is still quite remote from the everyday experience of many people?

MARTIN DIXON: If you live in the Parish and you're working among the people, you're not remote. You know the feelings, you know the pains, and you know the joys of it. You don't have to be married to know what it's like.

TONY EASTLEY: The parish priest of Melbourne St Simon's Church, Father Martin Dixon, speaking with AM's Nick Grimm.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholicchurch; priests; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-191 next last
To: AlienandStranger

Ive heard this before on another thread I think.


81 posted on 01/26/2005 10:17:38 AM PST by CouncilofTrent (Quo Primum...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Procyon

This is true, but its not common. If these priests' wives die, they are not permitted to re-marry. Same way for permanent deacons, they can be married when ordained, but are not permitted to re-marry after the death of their spouse.


82 posted on 01/26/2005 10:19:04 AM PST by OriginalChristian (W2 - Rock On...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: AlienandStranger

We have the Bible because of the Church not the other way around. Christ built a Church not a book. He built it on the rock, Peter. Read the bible, its in there.

Peace -


83 posted on 01/26/2005 10:20:46 AM PST by OriginalChristian (W2 - Rock On...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: coreenlarisa

And many are rejected because their superiors sense that they don't have a vocation in the first place. The road to Catholic priesthood in the Latin Rite is 9 years long. These men know what they are getting themselves into.


84 posted on 01/26/2005 10:22:30 AM PST by OriginalChristian (W2 - Rock On...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Well, if it were put to a vote, the vast majority of Catholics would accept a married priesthood.

The vast majority of Catholics don't have a clue about their faith.

Thank God the Church isn't a democracy.

85 posted on 01/26/2005 10:22:49 AM PST by BlessedBeGod (George W. Bush -- The Terror of the Terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: AlienandStranger
Well, I guess we're getting a little off topic but I need to respond. It says towards the end of the Bible that Jesus taught many things which weren't listed in the Bible. Jesus also gave the keys to his kingdom to Peter. This authority is how we are able to discern the true New Testament writing from the gnostic gospels and other invented writings.

By the way, since you aren't a Catholic anymore, can you tell me how you can discern the correct books in the Bible from the incorrect ones? And also can you say where Sola Scriptura is mentioned in the Bible?

(Matthew 16:18-19) And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hell will not prevail against it.

19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.

86 posted on 01/26/2005 10:22:53 AM PST by ndkos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

Comment #87 Removed by Moderator

To: coreenlarisa
No priest who belongs to the Roman Rite should be allowed to marry.

No one is suggesting that. What is being suggested is to allow married Catholic men to be ordained, just as the Anglican dispensation has brought married Episcopalian converts to the priesthood.

88 posted on 01/26/2005 10:24:41 AM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: tvn

89 posted on 01/26/2005 10:27:04 AM PST by Antoninus (In hoc sign, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mike182d
The only good produce is the satisfaction of sexual desires...

If your definition of marriage is so shallow as to limit it to permitted sex, then I certainly hope you aren't married. If so, Heaven help your spouse.

I'm not Catholic, so take my comments as those of an outsider, but I think its quite ironic that a priest is addressed as "Father" when he is barred from being one! The experience gained from being a father and a husband is irreplaceable, in my opinion as both.

90 posted on 01/26/2005 10:29:45 AM PST by TChris (Most people's capability for inference is severely overestimated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
What concerns me is that NO ONE wants to be a Catholic priest in America.

Not exactly. Read it...


91 posted on 01/26/2005 10:31:56 AM PST by Antoninus (In hoc sign, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith; american colleen; Salvation; NYer; sandyeggo
You have hit the nail on the head. I am tired of arguing the same-old,same-old. It is sad that so many well meaning Catholics think celibacy will solve so many problems and don't see the hand writing on the wall.

They don't seem to realize that the Church and Western Civilization are in a crisis and that there are folks out there who want to destroy both. The most effective way to exacerbate it and destabilize further is to step up the pace of change. The enemies' focus is to change things faster and introduce new systems,activities and disciplines at every opportunity.

Your sample headlines are a perfect example of what is in store if the drum beaters for a non-celibate priesthood get their way.

Currently when I see subtle and/or not so subtle attacks on the Holy Father or the role of the Papacy,or a big push for relaxing the rules on celibacy by those who call themselves catholic,I see persons with an agenda that is not Catholic,or in some cases people who are just becoming aware and need to be better informed.

If after two or three rounds,I see the same folks saying the same thing,I know they are not interested in keeping the Deposit of Faith as given to the Church by Jesus Christ but instead are trying to bring or"sing" a new church into being and destroy the old Church.

I believe that we must pray unceasingly and seek,speak and live the Truth to fulfill God's plan for His people on earth.

92 posted on 01/26/2005 10:32:09 AM PST by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AlienandStranger
There are not different "kinds" of sins (original, venial, mortal); all sins are equal in God's eyes.

The list goes on. By the way, I was raised a Roman Catholic and I also read the Bible.

You must not have read much of the Bible, because 1 John 5 16-17 specifically talks about sin that is "deadly" or "mortal" (the two words are equivalent) and sin that isn't. So I guess it's your tradition that directly contradicts the Bible, huh?

93 posted on 01/26/2005 10:34:41 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
That does not alter the fact that it's mighty slim pickins out there. That's not an opinion. That's a fact.

The slim pickins is an illusion created by derelict bishops who are failing at recruiting new priests on purpose. See www.goodbyegoodmen.com and make sure you read the "feedback" section.
94 posted on 01/26/2005 10:36:07 AM PST by Antoninus (In hoc sign, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: coreenlarisa

It seems like many are.


95 posted on 01/26/2005 10:39:57 AM PST by AlienandStranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: AlienandStranger
There are not different "kinds" of sins (original, venial, mortal); all sins are equal in God's eyes.
But I say to you, that whosoever is angry with his brother, shall be in danger of the judgment. And whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council. And whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire. (Matt 5:22)

96 posted on 01/26/2005 10:41:26 AM PST by gbcdoj ("The Pope orders, the cardinals do not obey, and the people do as they please" - Benedict XIV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: tvn

The orthodox church allows for marriage and has since before there was a roman catholic church.

The caviate is that you have to BE married when becomeing a priest and you can't get married after being a priest. Which is why many decons wait to get married before taking the final vows.

The other caviate is that the priest can only go up to a certain rank as a married priest and the higher ranks are for unmarried only. (arch bishop)

And just for added information, the nicean creed includes the line "one holy catholic and apostolic church..." So technically there is a catholic (which just means universal) church which allows marriage.

I think these priests have a valid point worth discussing. No snap judgments either way.


97 posted on 01/26/2005 10:41:37 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; CouncilofTrent
Well, if it were put to a vote, the vast majority of Catholics would accept a married priesthood.

Well, you know what they say, sometimes a majority just means that all the fools are on the same side. ;-).

Anyway, if the whole Church were allowed to vote, not just the Church Militant, but the Church Suffering and the Church Triumphant celibacy would be the clear choice of course.

98 posted on 01/26/2005 10:42:03 AM PST by murphE ("I ain't no physicist, but I know what matters." - Popeye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

so according to the link, the leftist homosexuals in the catholic church don't want marriage because it would mean more heterosexuals in the priesthood. Men with children would cramp their leftist agenda.


99 posted on 01/26/2005 10:44:04 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: saradippity
If after two or three rounds,I see the same folks saying the same thing,I know they are not interested in keeping the Deposit of Faith as given to the Church by Jesus Christ but instead are trying to bring or"sing" a new church into being and destroy the old Church.

Requiring celibacy of priests has absolutely nothing to do with the Deposit of Faith.

100 posted on 01/26/2005 10:48:16 AM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson