Replies

Looks like Bush did better than usual with the vipers.

He is more relaxed and almost jovial at times.

I do understand that we are safer with other countries having freedom BUT I don't know where Bush plans on drawing the line on who we help with freedom and who we don't since we can't possibly free the world.

When Bush speaks of freedom, I have to wince alittle. We have freedom here for the most part but we are busily abusing this freedom. What kind of an example are we exhibiting for the world? What we tolerate morally is atrocious - abortion, simulated kiddie porn is okay (U.S.Supreme Court decision), partisan politics and with the media at large vilifying anything that is good. I have to wonder how this will play out.

I can easily see Muslims for example, talking up their strict moral code and justifying their hate of the "infidel". Sure they are perverted creepy people BUT this isn't talked about or reported on much. They also want Sharia law that goes with Islam. It would make sense from the radical perspective. If people have been so brain washed to be a Muslim why reject the law that goes with their religion?

Another concern I have is our borders. It will be a tough balancing act with keeping criminals and terrorists out while allowing hard working ones in. Are there some dramatic changes going on to insure this since what we have in place seems to be problematic.

Not that I know of.

BUT I don't know where Bush plans on drawing the line on who we help with freedom and who we don't since we can't possibly free the world.

I don't think it is as radical as it sounds on the surface. We will help the entire world reach for freedom one step at a time, whether it be militarily or just promoting the ideals of freedom.

We have freedom here for the most part but we are busily abusing this freedom. What kind of an example are we exhibiting for the world?

I have to agree with you on this. Something definitely needs to be done to stop the left and ACLU from chipping away at our moral values.