Posted on 01/24/2005 5:51:22 PM PST by joesbucks
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON Jan 24, 2005 — Regulators rejected 36 complaints of indecency Monday against popular TV shows including "Friends" and "The Simpsons."
The objections had been filed with the Federal Communications Commission by the Parents Television Council, a watchdog group that frequently complains about sex and violence on television.
"In context, none of the segments were patently offensive under contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium, and thus not indecent," the agency said in a statement. The FCC also ruled "the material was not profane, in context."
Three members of the five-member FCC approved the orders: Chairman Michael Powell and Kathleen Abernathy, both Republicans; and Democrat Jonathan Adelstein. The two other commissioners, Democrat Michael Copps and Republican Kevin Martin, dissented on parts of the rulings.
Copps said in a statement that the agency should have performed a more thorough investigation. "I believe that some of these broadcasts present a much closer call," he said.
Powell announced last week he was leaving the FCC in March. Martin, who has been rumored to be among candidates to replace him as chairman, did not comment Monday but said he would issue a statement at a later date.
The Parents Television Council alleged that the programs, which aired between Oct. 29, 2001, and Feb. 11, 2004, contained sexually explicit segments or used indecent or profane language that violated indecency standards.
"In what community in America are graphic terms for genitalia decent?" said Lara Mahaney, a spokeswoman for the council. "The commission's ruling added no clarification and added more confusion."
One complaint involved an episode of NBC's "Friends" that aired in May 2003. In it, a female character, her husband and the husband's ex-girlfriend talk about a fertility treatment at a medical office.
A complaint over "The Simpsons," which airs on Fox, included a scene from a November 2003 episode in which students carried picket signs with the phrases "What would Jesus glue?" and "Don't cut off my pianissimo."
Federal law bars nonsatellite radio and noncable television stations from airing references to sexual and excretory functions between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when children are more likely to be listening and watching.
The FCC said the segments in question "were not patently offensive" within the context of the shows.
The FCC's responses to indecency complaints have received extra scrutiny since singer Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" at last year's Super Bowl halftime show.
The FCC received more than 1 million indecency complaints in 2004, most of them involving the exposure of Jackson's breast during her performance. Fines for indecent programming exceeded $7.7 million last year, a huge increase from the $48,000 imposed in 2000, the year before Powell became chairman.
Powell has said the crackdown was in response to mounting complaints from consumers and Congress.
Copps criticized Monday's rulings as "rather cursory decisions" that did not address the objections of viewers nor those of skittish broadcasters worried about what may be too racy to air. He singled out concern for a movie that aired on ABC in May 2003, "The Diary of Ellen Rimbauer."
A scene from the movie cited in the complaint included a male character tying up a woman in bed and then applying ice to her abdomen.
Several House and Senate members say they plan to introduce bills in the next few weeks to raise the maximum indecency fine. A similar bill that would increase the top fine from $32,500 to as much as $500,000 per incident stalled in Congress.
The commission today rejected a series of complaints filed by the Parents Television Council against a number of television programs, including Friends, Will & Grace, Scrubs, NYPD Blue and Gilmore Girls, among others. Many of the complaints focused on dialogue that included the word "dick," although others cited use of "bitch," "penis," "bastard," "testicle" and "ass." Other complaints centered on more vague statements, such as an episode of the WB programCharmed during which a female character discussed whether to"take it to the next level" with her boyfriend. In denying the complaints, the FCC stated, "Although use of such words may, depending on the nature of the broadcast at issue, contribute to a finding of indecency, their use here was not patently offensive and therefore not indecent." Of PTC's numerous complaints focused on the word "dick," the FCC said, "In context and as used in the complained-of broadcasts, these were epithets intended to denigrate or were a paly on words. Their use in these contexts was not sufficiently explicit or graphic and/or sustained to be patently offensive."
Talk about a double entendre for the FCC: dick and dyke! ;)
Still looking for that provision in the Constitution, but when I find it I'll let the forum know.
I thought there were only seven words that couldn't be said going back to the 70's. Carlin's bit on the seven words is still funny.
Homer says"....But florida is Americas Wang!"
LMAO!!!
There's a thing called a remote. USE IT.
Well, I for one sure don't want to turn on the TV at all hours of the day and hear toilet language - regardless of whether my kids are in the room or not. Having said that, it gets to get to be a slippery slope. They are all just words after all. If one word for genitalia is ok to use, why not another? If dick is ok and can be used regularly, why not the c word? Can someone explain the rationale here?
Somewhere Mr. Morris and Mr. Van Dyke are breathing a sigh of relief...
And apparently on "Free Republic" as well.
That ain't gonna last long. But dang is it funny...
YOU ----!!
What's wrong with dick?
It is what it is.
You are behind the times. The corresponding word "a##" is already in use on TV.
I'm headed for my bunker. The End Times are surely here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.