Replies

That's how science goes, as we dig deeper and deeper into the underpinnings of the universe and trying to figure out how it works we get more and more complex stuff that can never be not complex.

I'm getting it fine. I just don't mistake the picture for the actual dish. There's a lot of stuff under the Creeds that should be learned to understand and apply the Creeds.

I never said the Creeds were in error. I said they weren't the whole picture, and they're not, and until we have a revolution in the way humans communicate with each other they can't be. For what they are, with the limitations put on them by our clumsy methods, the Creeds are excellent. They do a very good job of attempting to accomplish the impossible and those that formulated them should be proud of their work; but the task put forward was impossible and remains unacheived and unacheivable for the forseeable future, and that's something that shouldn't be forgotten.

You've already had it stated to you multiple times. Why do you just keep asking the same question over and over? Just read the damn answers that have been provided and stop insisting those aren't answers. You have been answered, if you disagree with the answer then present your disagreement and allow the conversation to move on, the circular discussion does nothing but make it monotonous.

I never said the Creeds were in error. I said they weren't the whole picture

But they are - that's why they were composed under God, The Holy Spirit. You have to deny the latter to deny the importance of the former. The four principal Creeds of The Church ARE the dogmatic statement of the Faith. Period! Volumes have been written about the lives that have been lived based on that confession. But they did not deny what you've denied, here.

proud of their work; but the task put forward was impossible

So you do deny God, The Holy Spirit. You say He bit off more than he could chew? You say He foolishly attempted the impossible. You know I don't share your pessimism, nor your blasphemy.

Why do you just keep asking the same question over and over?

Concerning evolution, you mean? To answer, Why? and why not take vague, incomplete and inconsistent sentiment as a scientific? Science.