Posted on 01/16/2005 7:22:34 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature
Hey, I'm on your side.
Large cat doesn't mean house cat, it means mountain lion-size cat. It's also false to say that it is part of evolutinary premise that mammals were the size of chipmunks back then. They state in the article that mammals 2/3 the size were already known about, so, while significant, it doesn't really go against anything already know. Besides, evolutionary theory does not require a species to grow in size over time. In the end, all this means is that we've found another hole in our fossile record, which nobody every claimed was complete.
The theory of evolution says nothing of the kind. The fossil record says it. And now they found one (out of thousands) exception to the rule: A slightly larger mammal having eaten a smaller (probably hatchling) dinosaur.
Oh, how will the theory ever hold up now??? =:-O
What a laugh. Did I hurt your feeings so you called me a troll? (your predicted answer, no I called you a troll because you are stupid, arrogant, mean, etc).
Evolution is a fact. The theory part is the how.
Just like Darrow and the ACLU took it to Bryan and the fundies in the 20s, logic should and will ridicule fundies now for taking such an extremist stand. I agree with conservatives on many things, but this is the 21st century and science is what keeps us ahead of the pack.
"Your post borders on bigotry."
Your post borders on irresponsibility.
It was Lost_in_the_void that you apparently meant to respond to, not me.
That cretin, whom I now shall ignore as a lowlife-scum-sucking, invertebrate was the one trolling for anger, not me.
I am a Creationist in that I believe that God created the Universe, life and humanity. I also believe that he did it by way of a gradual process that many today call evolution.
I am not bigoted toward Creationists, though many of them are abit trigger happy, it would seem.
Yes, apparently it was.
It is a comment on that cretins inflamatory rhetoric that he provokes peopleinto such angry responses that they dont get the attributions right.
Folks, I am going to ignore Lost_in_the_Void as he is not trying to generate any form of rational discussion, but is merely provoking people with his insults and broad-sweeping statements that are simply stupid.
After all the threads I have posted in regarding evolution, he still thinks I disagree with the scientific theory of evolution, for example. How do you carry on a discussion with an ignoramus like that? You dont, you ignore him and save your energy for productive thought, which is what I am going to do. Just say no to Lost_in_the_Void.
That's right, right here in my belly!
"Evolution is a fact. The theory part is the how."
Ok smartguy. Where did the first cell(s) come from? It's such a fact, how come we can't make life out of non-life? How does something "evolve" from nothing? Why do things become less efficient with evolutionary stages? A single cell can live alot easier than a multicelled organism. They (single celled organisms) can also do it more efficiently too. Why would something that requires more effort be able to live so well?
Fossil Is Proof of Mammal Eating Dinosaur
AP | 1-12-05 | JOSEPH B. VERRENGIA
Posted on 01/12/2005 1:57:57 PM EST by Pharmboy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1319341/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.