To: Dan from Michigan
What ever happened to "clean" fun? Does it have to include profanity to be fun?
462 posted on
01/12/2005 1:05:05 PM PST by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
Does it have to include profanity to be fun? Yes.
464 posted on
01/12/2005 1:06:31 PM PST by
StoneColdGOP
(Better to have government by the masses than government by the asses.)
To: mlc9852
What ever happened to "clean" fun? Does it have to include profanity to be fun? No. And I for one lament that there is not more clean fun stuff that I can enjoy.
But there is a difference between wanting the entertainment market to expand it's menu and wanting things removed from it.
One I applaud. The other I can not support.
498 posted on
01/12/2005 1:19:45 PM PST by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum europe vincendarum (V minus 3 and counting))
To: mlc9852
What ever happened to "clean" fun? Does it have to include profanity to be fun? It doesn't HAVE to have profanity to be fun, but there is profane stuff that is fun(and profane stuff that isn't).
I use profanity at times. Other times I don't. John Kerry's F'bomb in ESPN was inappropiate as it wasn't the time or place(nor did he use it correctly). Cheney's (to Leahy) was perfect and got the point across in the correct matter.
556 posted on
01/12/2005 1:41:19 PM PST by
Dan from Michigan
("I can't name a single accomplishment of Debbie Stabenow." - Rep. Leon Drolet)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson