To: ejdrapes
I don't think it would have been proper for the Republican party to promote Kid Rock. As one who rails against the decline in our culture in general, and in so-called music especially, I am glad he won't be performing. People have the choice to listen to his type of entertainment, but I don't think he would have been an appropriate entertainer for inauguration events.
2 posted on
01/12/2005 10:42:01 AM PST by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
I agree. Kid Rock music may or may not be ok for private consumption, but not acceptable for Inaugural events for the Republican party.
9 posted on
01/12/2005 10:47:10 AM PST by
loborojo
(What the hell is a "Reagan Democrat"?)
To: mlc9852
which caused several pro-family organizations to ask their supporters to protest his appearance.Whatta bunch of buzzkills. I guess the Republican party has its own "political correctness" wing..
To: mlc9852
What should we have instead? Wayne Newton? Debbie Boone? Some stupid Christian rock band?
370 posted on
01/12/2005 12:44:05 PM PST by
Clemenza
(President: Liger Breeders of the Pacific Northwest)
To: mlc9852
Look, guys, if Kid Rock is basically contrary to mainstream conservative Republican values, don't you think he'd be an embarrassment to the President at this?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson