Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshutupandtakeit
Both books are "worth" reading.

The first, because it provides a definitive refutation-once and for all-of the baseless assertion that the South-which, at the time, consisted of only five states-would have irrevocably severed its ties to the other thirteen colonies, had chattel slavery been abolished in the original framing of the U.S. Constitution.

The second, because it illustrates-in enthralling detail-why Abraham Lincoln was the single greatest wartime leader that this nation has ever had.

90 posted on 01/11/2005 9:58:38 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("Oi! Oi! Is this a proper parliament?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: Do not dub me shapka broham

I don't believe there is a convincing argument to be made that the Southern states would have ratified the Constitution had it freed slaves (assuming it could have purchased them which is a hell of an assumption given the bankrupt Confederation). Hell for that matter that might have defeated it in New York since areas of that state had as high a concentration of slaves as any area of the nation.
It barely passed there as it was.

I do not need convincing of Lincoln's greatness all I have to do is read some of the garbage posted here by the Lincolnhaters such as the latest "Lincoln was Gay" absurdity. But I would not place him above Washington in that regard.


94 posted on 01/11/2005 10:12:48 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson