To: bushfamfan
He's a flaming liberal. I refuse to watch his movie too.
2 posted on
01/10/2005 10:36:37 AM PST by
biblewonk
(Neither was the man created for woman but the woman for the man.)
To: biblewonk
I never really bought that he was this great conservative like many here seemed to believe. This kinship comment does it for me. He's on my boycott list. He suckered a lot of people with Passion though.
To: biblewonk
There is virtually nothing liberal about Gibson. His kinship refers to the blasting of the films. He has said he thinks anyone who can (money..support..etc) should be allowed to make movies.
He has said for nearly two years he is unsure about the war in Iraq. None of this makes him a liberal. Besides liberals are not pro-life or pro family or do they support Christianity.
8 posted on
01/10/2005 10:41:51 AM PST by
roylene
To: biblewonk
Well I saw his speech and nothing that he said raised a flag with me. And by the way, no one dislikes the liberal Moore more than I do.
To: biblewonk
One more reason to miss The Passion of Christ According to Mel.
129 posted on
01/10/2005 11:34:40 AM PST by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
To: biblewonk
Interview with Gibson
here. I wonder how one pronounces "f***ing"?
I read another interview with him in some entertainment magazine or other, and the "f" word seems to be a vitally important part of his vocabulary. What a fraud.
169 posted on
01/10/2005 11:55:17 AM PST by
6323cd
("It is prohibited to make use of such emotional signs in a cellphone!")
To: biblewonk
He's not a flaming liberal. I think it's okay if someone feels uncomfortable with a Christian movie defining red state America (as if there are no blue state Christians).
181 posted on
01/10/2005 12:04:46 PM PST by
mowkeka
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson