To: woofer
So....you're gonna defend the Captain? This is usually a pretty big no-no for a ship's commander, a career-ender. I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt
.
19 posted on
01/08/2005 3:52:09 AM PST by
Elle Bee
To: Elle Bee
"I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt"
He has the lives of 100+ people in his hands. He deserves no "benefit of the doubt".
25 posted on
01/08/2005 4:05:01 AM PST by
Lokibob
(All typos and spelling errors are mine and copyrighted!!!!)
To: Elle Bee
I'm on your side. Their mission was to go into shallow water. That's a tricky business. This guy could be a dynamite captain, and who knows the circumstances? I'm sure they don't release the technical details to FR first.
29 posted on
01/08/2005 4:24:06 AM PST by
mudblood
To: Elle Bee
So....you're gonna defend the Captain? This is usually a pretty big no-no for a ship's commander, a career-ender. I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt
Give him all the benefit you want...The Navy won't. I believe that there have been 10 skippers fired within the past year for either collisions or grounds. This CO is most likely toast. .
To: Elle Bee
You mean maybe he didn't run aground before he did run aground!
Benefit of what doubt.....either he did or he didn't. This is not a johnkerry moment!!!
337 posted on
01/08/2005 8:21:30 AM PST by
OldFriend
(PRAY FOR MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH)
To: Elle Bee
I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt..
Well and good, but Naval commanders know the consequences of something like this are a hearing, and a forced retirement. it's just part of their code.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson