Nuking Mecca won't accomplish anything, except alienate almost all the Muslims in the world. But threatening Damascus, Khartoum or any other potential terrorist- harboring states is more practical. Even that Libyan leader is untrustworthy.
"O ye of little faith.."
Who cares about Damascus or Khartoum? Do you think the threat of us nuking Damascus is gonna make the extremsists in Indonesia come around? They could care less.
The threat of us nuking Mecca though. That gets their attention, or as my father used to say. "Gets them by the short and curlies"
Why not take out all of those Islamic "hot spots" at once?! It's not like we don't have enough Nukes to spare!
Another attack on The United States would alienate Americans to the point of calling for a real photo similar to the one in post 2.
Israel recognizes that the Aswan Dam is Egypt's Damoclean Sword,"
Israel ,,, recognizes ... the list is long and to the point, my guess.
Well... where have you been? Ever heard of 9/11? And we did... what to cause that event?
Nuking Mecca won't accomplish anything, except alienate almost all the Muslims in the world.
Uhhh....Muslim extremists aready feel alienated from us....Nuking Mecca won't do anything more but make them more brazen. If we do nothing about them, then over the long run they'll get more brazen anyway!
.....except alienate almost all the Muslims in the world.....
I think it would destroy the religion.
I think it would cause such unimagineable confusion that there would be suicides rather than retribution. Millions prostrate themselves facing Mecca to make prayers 5 times a day. Millions have the Haj obligation to visit Mecca.
If the place is gone and not rebuildable, If Allah has demonstrated his inability to prohibit the destruction, Allah has obviuosly abandoned his people. Abandonment leads to suicide.
I agree with you in everything but one. I don't know that nuking Mecca would alienate that many more Muslims than already hate America. I'm against it becuase using nukes at this point (unless, perhaps, the terrorists use nukes against us) would be opening a can of worms I don't think we want to open.
It would END their religion. No longer could they bow and pray to a stone idol or make the required pilgrimmage to it...
-
...except alienate almost all the Muslims in the world.
Most of the WOMEN in the "Muslim world" would probably cheer...
You mean there are muslims left in the world to alienate?
Uhh, and there are how many that we haven't already alienated by daring to defend ourselves against the swine?
"Nuking Mecca won't accomplish anything, except alienate almost all the Muslims in the world"
A well placed neutron bomb would do wonders, creating a living radioactive signpost. As I recall all Muslims are supposed to visit Mecca once in their lives. We could even issue travel vouchers.
It totally obliterates one of their pillars of their faith, making it obvious that the religion is not backed by God, since God did not protect it and they are only left with 4 pillars unless they want to glow in the dark.
Nuking Mecca does a lot in the fight against islam, not only does it let muslims know their religion is false it plainly puts forward that they are toast if they mess with the West. It is what has happened over and over throughout history when islam is on the march and the West or others have put a stop to its march.....something so horrific is done that it scares the living daylights out of them thus stopping the march for a century or so until it is forgotten.
The only problem I see is in believing that the State Department or any part of the US government has the gumption to go through with this plan.....FAT CHANCE.
"Nuking Mecca won't accomplish anything, except alienate almost all the Muslims in the world."
Well they hate us anyway so it doesnt really matter.
If there is another attack we should make an example of Mecca.
"Nuking Mecca won't accomplish anything, except alienate almost all the Muslims in the world"
- Like nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki alienated all the Japanese and prolonged THAT war.
'Nuking Mecca won't accomplish anything, except alienate almost all the Muslims in the world.'
I'm not sure even I am ballsy enough to actually advocate this as a real possibility. However, if it were to occur, the consequence would be similar to Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.
It is the kind of crushing, un-rationalizable defeat necessary to clear the decks for a lasting peace. Remember, like the primitive, racist imperial Japanese, the Islamics are uncivilized magical-thinking barbarians. They would not have the cognitive sophistication to overcome such a spectacular repudiation of their crude pseudo-religious superstition-based "culture."
In short, the threat would work because the act itself would work.
I'm still trying to get over the Dome on the Rock.