Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Interesting that he didn't apply Clinton's name in there. Could there be a rift in the Hollywood/Clinton relationship? I agree, let Moore speak for the next four years. He only exemplifies why the Dems lost and why Hollywood doesn't get a second look for their opinions.
42 posted on 01/06/2005 8:20:36 AM PST by Moatengator83Herd (Don't jump the gun, you may jump in front of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Moatengator83Herd

Actually, Katie asked whether Hillary could also be a good candidate or whether she was too divisive. Moore responded that she could be good, that millions like her, and that the Republicans didn't worry about W being too divisive or the fact that millions detested him. But it's true that he didn't initially raise Hillary's names in his list of favored possible candidates.


44 posted on 01/06/2005 8:24:45 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson