Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Charged Under Patriot Act for Laser
news.yahoo.com ^ | 04Jan05

Posted on 01/04/2005 4:27:48 PM PST by Las Vegas Dave

NEWARK, N.J. - Federal authorities Tuesday used the Patriot Act to charge a man with pointing a laser beam at an airplane overhead and temporarily blinding the pilot and co-pilot.

The FBI (news - web sites) acknowledged the incident had no connection to terrorism but called David Banach's actions "foolhardy and negligent."

Banach, 38, of Parsippany admitted to federal agents that he pointed the light beam at a jet and a helicopter over his home near Teterboro Airport last week, authorities said. Initially, he claimed his daughter aimed the device at the helicopter, they said.

He is the first person arrested after a recent rash of reports around the nation of laser beams hitting airplanes.

Banach was charged only in connection with the jet. He was accused of interfering with the operator of a mass transportation vehicle and making false statements to the FBI, and was released on $100,000 bail. He could get up to 25 years in prison and fines of up to $500,000.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; davidbanach; homelandsecurity; laser; patriotact
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-178 next last
To: Cold Heart

Probably a surveyor's laser.


81 posted on 01/04/2005 9:37:18 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: traumer

He does have that "I'm the stupidest moron on the planet" expression. Poor guy.


82 posted on 01/04/2005 9:38:32 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic

Ich weiss nicht. Möglicherweise, Herr Schumer?


83 posted on 01/04/2005 9:48:24 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

Maybe one of the Patriot Act authors: Hart or Young (for the Young at Hart?) Maybe Diane Feinstein or Harry Reid.


84 posted on 01/04/2005 10:06:07 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

25 years with no parole sounds stiff to me.


85 posted on 01/04/2005 10:07:01 PM PST by wardaddy (Quisiera ser un pez para tocar mi nariz en tu pecera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Agreed.


86 posted on 01/04/2005 10:10:03 PM PST by wardaddy (Quisiera ser un pez para tocar mi nariz en tu pecera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: NMC EXP

Well I guess we are starting to realize the Patriot Act isn't just about Terrorism. It's about giving the federal government more power.


87 posted on 01/04/2005 10:10:37 PM PST by OneTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart
I heard it was a more powerful "green" laser.

I've seen laser toys for made for cats. They chase the dot like it was a piece of string.

I can't imagine something powered by a couple of AA batteries could cause such a problem.

88 posted on 01/04/2005 10:36:09 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

I can't imagine something powered by a couple of AA batteries could cause such a problem.

..........................

The cat toy lasers are class II red diodes running at one or two milliwatts, at most five. You can power quite a laser with AAs- the green lasers are "diode pumped solid state frequency doubled" (DPSSFD) lasers that can crank out up to 40 mW or even more, though battery life is poor.

Because the green light is much closer to the sensitivity of the eye, they will look (to the eye) to be twenty times brighter than a red laser.

So if you figure the 5mW green pointer laser has twice the power and your eye has twenty times the sensitivity, the DPSSFD laser will appear to be fourty times brighter than the red "cat toy"- capable of causing much glare and dazzle in your eye but probably not any permanent damage.

If you get one of the boosted DPSSFD pointers, the power can be 40 mW- very very bright and still running on AA cells.

I have an ultraviolet LED light that runs on two CR0232 cells (button cells) that came with a stern warning about eye damage- although the light appears to be dim to teh eye, there's apparently 500 mW of 370nm UV coming out of the LED, enough to cook my corneas if I'm not careful.


89 posted on 01/05/2005 5:43:43 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: vaudine

Sure. that sounds plausible.

So before te Patriot Act was passed he wouldn't have been charged? Of coures he would have, but under what statutes?


90 posted on 01/05/2005 5:55:51 AM PST by eleni121 (4 more years and then 4 more again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: traumer

maybe he'll drop a couple lbs in prison


91 posted on 01/05/2005 5:58:46 AM PST by petercooper (DEAN in '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

He won't get 25 years. He should however, be held responsible for his actions, a concept which will no doubt piss the left off.


92 posted on 01/05/2005 6:01:31 AM PST by Sam's Army (No witty taglines currently come to mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

There are laws about lasers near airports. The law sets up three zones, and each zone has a maximum power density.

IIRC, the closest zone is two miles, and it basically says "no laser beam", then the other zones are concentric. The outer zone is, I think, 6 microwatts of laser light per square centimeter. The law is set up to protect airports from outdoor laser shows or indistrial/scientific laser use.

If this guy met these guidelines, then there is "interfering with an aircraft" which includes bright lights, spotlights, searchlights, and lasers. There probably is a specific federal law that states that you can't shine a laser at an aircraft so that it bothers the pilots, but I'm not sure.

Then there are state and local laws- malicious mischief is a good broad category.

There are enough existing laws to convince this dude he had a lapse in judgement. I think the Patriot Act is an overkill; one that could backfire if the defense is on the ball.

When I have time I'll link to a post that has the limits and distances for airports and lasers.


93 posted on 01/05/2005 6:17:57 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Certainly aiming a laser beam at a pilot should be punished most harshly...but since nothing happened and no one was harmed how could it be charged under Patriot?

If his intentions were not terror based, Patriot should not be used I guess. But I'm not sure...


94 posted on 01/05/2005 6:40:00 AM PST by eleni121 (4 more years and then 4 more again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
but since nothing happened and no one was harmed how could it be charged under Patriot?

So, if I shoot at you with a gun, but miss, that makes it OK?

95 posted on 01/05/2005 6:49:19 AM PST by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: cspackler

First: This guy, in light of 9/11 and the like, is a complete idiot for doing something like this and thinking that it would not be suspected as terrorism.

Second: This guy certainly has a few screws loose if he has kids and is doing this sort of thing.

Third: you never talk to the feds or the police unless you have an attorney present. To do otherwise is complete foolishness.

Fourth: The patriot act should not apply here. I agree this guy should do some time, but not 25 years. Yes, he could have potentially caused harm, but the fact is that he did not and is clearly not a terrorist. Maybe a nut, but not a terrorist.

Fifth: After Martha Stewart, what was this idiot thinking blaming his daughter?


96 posted on 01/05/2005 6:56:52 AM PST by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: cspackler

"So, if I shoot at you with a gun, but miss, that makes it OK?"


Of course not. I wrote:

Certainly aiming a laser beam at a pilot should be punished most harshly

I am simply asking, just asking, about Patriot being used in this case. If the intent was not terror, why is Patriot being used? Can't this guy get punished under other statutes? By the way, pointing a gun at someone and pointing a lasser at a plane full of people is quite different. The latter should be punished more harshly and if Patriot can do that so be it.


97 posted on 01/05/2005 6:59:59 AM PST by eleni121 (4 more years and then 4 more again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave
Banach told the agents it was his daughter who shined the laser at the helicopter, according to court papers.

Brave man blaming the incident on his daughter. "The b*tch set me up."

98 posted on 01/05/2005 7:05:37 AM PST by ClintonBeGone (In politics, sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
Wonder how they caught him. Hm

Vee haff our vays.

99 posted on 01/05/2005 7:08:45 AM PST by ClintonBeGone (In politics, sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
"All anti-social behavior is terrorism."

It's far worse than that, I'm afraid. It's more along the lines of "any act deemed 'bad' is potentially an act of terrorism entirely at the disgretion of whoever is in a position of power at the time". Hillary's enforcement of the PATRIOT ACT would be far, far worse than this. I'd hardly call it paranoia to say that the incredibly broad language of PATRIOT could be stretched to the point of enforcing a perfectly legal police state. 'Evidence' could be collected entirely in secret, warrants issued in secret, and now, American citizens arrested and detained in secret with no recourse against the government. Now let's see - who might someone like Hillary want "investigated" ("FIND something NOW!"), arrested, and detained in secret?

PATRIOT, TIA, etc are all fantastic if you place absolute trust that no agent of the government will ever abuse power, authority, and disgretion, and if that holds true. The problem is, we do sometimes get less than trustworthy people in seats of power throughout the government.
100 posted on 01/05/2005 7:20:21 AM PST by NJ_gent (Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson