Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Jets Buzz Iran Airspace
World Net Daily ^ | 1-3-05

Posted on 01/03/2005 6:28:43 PM PST by hope

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: hope

Uh-oh...now we've done it! They're gonna be REALLY REALLY mad at us now.


41 posted on 01/03/2005 7:13:44 PM PST by Pharmboy (Listen...you can still hear the old media sobbing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK
My thought was "ferret." Apparantly the Iranians agree.

Iranian military specialists believe the intrusions are designed to assess the capabilities of Iran's anti-aircraft defenses.

42 posted on 01/03/2005 7:15:32 PM PST by ASA Vet (FR needs a science forum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
With the equipment we have in the region... we would annihilate any push by their land forces. Remember... this is what we did to Saddams forces in 1991 (the 5th largest miltiary on earth).
43 posted on 01/03/2005 7:15:32 PM PST by Andrew LB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Toespi; hope; snowsislander

Let me do the cartology. Iraq on the west border and Afgahnistan on the east border. Well looky there. Iran just so happens to be surrounded by our troops. I love it when a plan comes together


44 posted on 01/03/2005 7:15:50 PM PST by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Andrew LB
Lets try this again... (from my own server)
45 posted on 01/03/2005 7:16:51 PM PST by Andrew LB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Andrew LB

what iran could do I think is wreck alot of shipping in the persian gulf - anti ship missiles hitting oil tankers, they could probably close the gulf for a short time.


46 posted on 01/03/2005 7:18:33 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy

I think the Iranians are beginning to get it...


47 posted on 01/03/2005 7:20:02 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
Good. We have to take out Iran, and I am glad that our resolve has not weakened. Allowing Iran to have nuclear weapons would be folly, and there is nothing at this late point that we can do except to use military force.

Of course Iran will not be allowed to produce an offensive capable nuclear weapon - (why would you have ever expected they would have been able to do this....since GWB was elected in 2000?) -

However, Iran does not have a nuclear bomb nor is the military option the only option at this point (again, thank God for the leadership and seriousness of GWB and Rumsfeld) -

48 posted on 01/03/2005 7:20:14 PM PST by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zipcode101

a standing army of 2.anymillion means nothing if they don't have the guts, the expertise, or ability to co:ordinate ... how soon would it be before thay start tossing ten year olds into the mix? ... probably that would be smart in their case with our media reporting on us fighting pre-teen terrorists


49 posted on 01/03/2005 7:20:47 PM PST by InvisibleChurch (Good ol' Coney Island College. Go WhiteFish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Andrew LB

They were massed in one place, well mapped out by satellite, in the open...

The terrain in Iran is slightly different, if they massed in the mountains, we would have a more difficul time

Also, Saddam waited for us to attack, if Iran massed, they might actually have the smarts to not wait.

Whiel I am sure of our victory, we may have to use a tactical nuke or two to stop them, due to the sheer numbers.

Logistically, we can shut them down with surgical strikes on their supply line, tanks cannot run without gas!

But, we are not presently set up to do such thing.

If Iran just decided to go, we wouldn't have anything able to counter for a week, not in numbers anyways.


50 posted on 01/03/2005 7:21:32 PM PST by RaceBannon (Jesus: Born of the Jews, through the Jews, for the sins of the World!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: hope

As the F-18 Hornet flew at near Mach 1 speeds 300 ft above their heads. The Camels were crapping all over the Iranian Camel drivers that were craping allover their Camels !!!

Payback time for the American Hostages held so long ago! The Muslims are facing the fact that Americans remember!

Good Morning Syria, how's it hanging?


51 posted on 01/03/2005 7:21:41 PM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Sit nomen Dómini benedíctum,Ex hoc nunc, et usque in sæculum! per ómnia saecula saeculórum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
If they sent in F-16s or F-18s, it was because they wanted to be seen.

Exactly. The F-16s & F-18s were the left hand...

Where was W's right hand?

52 posted on 01/03/2005 7:22:23 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zipcode101
A standing army of 2.34 million

Who could not beat an Iraqi army that we went thru like a hot knife thru butter

53 posted on 01/03/2005 7:23:43 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (We are going to fight until hell freezes over and then we are going to fight on the ice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RJL

ehh.... i dunno if i want an answer to that question. :)

LoL.


54 posted on 01/03/2005 7:23:55 PM PST by Andrew LB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: konaice

There will be a large sale of Iranian AK-47's and WWII Vintage French Rifles; Never Fired, Dropped once!


55 posted on 01/03/2005 7:24:14 PM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Sit nomen Dómini benedíctum,Ex hoc nunc, et usque in sæculum! per ómnia saecula saeculórum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
nor is the military option the only option at this point

I don't see another option, myself -- not that that means a lot, I miss a lot of things. What do you see?

56 posted on 01/03/2005 7:24:14 PM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

Sort of like the, "use it or lose it" theory?


57 posted on 01/03/2005 7:27:13 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Andrew LB
ehh.... i dunno if i want an answer to that question. :)

LOL... Remember we're talking about GWB here, not the Clintoon!

58 posted on 01/03/2005 7:27:30 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Just testing the Iranians defenses, I suspect. Get them watching one hand while we slap them with the other.


59 posted on 01/03/2005 7:27:58 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zipcode101

Odds of 20:1 make it just about even.


60 posted on 01/03/2005 7:28:02 PM PST by RAY (They that do right are all heroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson