My first reply to #202 was #214, where I said: AHHHH! That's the worst pic of Ann I've ever seen! She looks like a reject from "Night Of The Living Dead"--shiver!
I didn't say anything about NYC GOP Chick, who I didn't even realize was in the pic.
NYC GOP Chick replied to me at #229: I have better ones that I'll put up later or tomorrow. She really is quite beautiful in person. :)
Later at #254, She said to Neets: Holy crap! That is hideous (of me)!
Trying to be sympathetic and funny but obviously failing at both, I said at #257: Don't be embarrassed. We all have hideous photos of ourselves floating out there somewhere. Though not all of us have them posted on the Internet where millions of people can see them :o
And finally at #294, NYC GOP Chick said to me: I posted it because I didn't consider it to be a hideous picture of me. Like most people, I don't really appreciate awful pictures of me -- especially blown up -- posted in a rather public place. I realize that may sound peculiar to you though...
I posted it because I didn't consider it to be a hideous picture of me.
That's not what she said at #254.
Like most people, I don't really appreciate awful pictures of me -- especially blown up -- posted in a rather public place.
She talks like I posted the damn pic. SHE POSTED IT! #202.
This argument is insane.
You are very mixed up, to put it kindly.
Yes, I put up the pic in 202. But I did NOT put up the ones in 241 -- they were put up without my permission and against my wishes. I was embarrassed by how I look in that post (241, NOT 202), and your attempt to be funny fell flat and frankly upset me.