You have to really split hairs in order to draw that conclusion. He was in favor of it. You might be able to parse his words and come up with some other conclusion, but that would be dishonest. Of course, don't put that past him.
"You have to really split hairs in order to draw that conclusion."
Maybe you're right; that's just the impression I got at the time. But it speaks volumes that, as far as I know, he never made an unambiguous endorsement of the war. He's a Clintonian straddler who has no clear vision and no clear moral compass.