Chat room league? What about my review (posted as soon as possible after waiting about an hour for the download)? The whole Meyer article was a species of specious logic deserving no specie.
No criticising your review, but did you charge that a specific named editor of a respected journal passed off an article as peer reviewed when it was not? You might have speculated, but did you say it outright? (I don't know the answer to this question.) Basically what is being charged here is a conspiracy to slip an article past the peer review process in such a way that it could be presented as peer reviewed. Since the article is now being cited in court cases, the fraud is not trivial. If the charge is true it will destroy the career of the editor and possibly ruin the magazine.