No criticising your review, but did you charge that a specific named editor of a respected journal passed off an article as peer reviewed when it was not? You might have speculated, but did you say it outright? (I don't know the answer to this question.) Basically what is being charged here is a conspiracy to slip an article past the peer review process in such a way that it could be presented as peer reviewed. Since the article is now being cited in court cases, the fraud is not trivial. If the charge is true it will destroy the career of the editor and possibly ruin the magazine.
No, I just pointed out that the paper was short on sequitur and long on undefinined terms.
You are right though about the charges. Trying to circumvent the peer-review process (as Meyer and von Sternberg are charged with) is serious. If shown, it puts Meyer and von Sternberg in the same class as Rather and CBS.