"Because you think ID is equivalent to a myth does not make it so."
And because YOU think evolution is a cultic belief does not make it so.
See how that works?
"And because YOU think evolution is a cultic belief does not make it so.
See how that works?"
I have no problem with that, I know it cuts both ways. You however won't allow competitive ideas.
Exactly true - but there is a problem. What the ACLU wants is only one belief to be taught, not both in a side-by-side nature. And for public institutions, that means my tax dollars go to pay for that one prescribed belief.
"And because YOU think evolution is a cultic belief does not make it so.
See how that works?"
LOL! Nice call. Still, that's about the only argument Creationists have in this discussion. That, and "Well, that's not what the Bible says!".
My dissertation was in values and beliefs.
As SCIENCE is currently practiced and published--as other authors have well illustrated--
IT HAS *ALL* THE HALLMARKS AND DEFINING POINTS OF RELIGION AND RELIGIOUS DOGMA.
That happens to be a very SCIENTIFIC fact, actually.
You can deny it until the cows come home. Doesn't change the facts.
Let's get this straight before we break our brains any further. A theory equals a theory. ID and evolution are actually on equal footing since they are both theories that are plausible. To say that ID is not plausible is simply closed minded. I am willing to accept that Evolution might be right, and that does not change my religious opinions. Can you say the same about ID?