"Could I get that in English?"
NO
"And the astute reader will note the large difference between the current version, wherein JMT asserts that "all he said" was that we are "obsessed with the flesh", and the original, "they are completely obsessed with their flesh". "
Either statement "obsessed with the flesh" or they are completely obsessed with their flesh". Pick either one.
Paranoid much?
No. Nice attempt.
"That's nice and all, but it fails to answer the question I posed. You wanted to see an evolutionist address a certain point you were interested in, and I'm trying to answer it, but I need clarification on what specifically you're asking about.
Once again, are you going to provide the clarification, or are you going to admit that you don't really want an answer after all? If the latter, are you going to stop complaining that "The E crowd never addresses this either they are completely obsessed with their flesh", since it's becoming apparent that you run away from honest attempts *to* address it?"
Here we go again, before I was insulting and now you question my honesty.
Why would I choose to discuss with you anything when you do the very things you accuse me of doing.
You waitin' for theme music or something?
Because I'm still trying to discuss something of substance with you. Let me know if you are, or if you're just here for the banter and to slur people as "completely obsessed" and so on.
You earlier stated that you had never seen an evolutionist address a certain point. Now I'm beginning to see why -- when they try, you start questioning their motives, their mental state, and your own willingness to have a discussion.
Now, one more time -- do you want to discuss that point you raised, or are you just jacking me around?