It's not an ad hominem attack to challenge your implication that you guys are all sweetness and light over there. You must be terribly disappointed that you can't bring that crap over here and not have someone call you on it. Sorry, but you'll get over it, I'm sure, probably just as soon as some poor new guy with the wrong doctrine checks in on that forum, and you guys find fresh meat to strip down to the bone.
Really? Where, exactly, do you imagine he asserted such a thing?
More transference.
More fantasies (or poor reading comprehension) on your part, actually.
I've heard about these riveting evo discussions which struggle to edify and elevate the forum.
...and you've added exactly *what* edifying information about evolutionary biology to this thread, and have "elevated" it how, precisely?
Recall, for example, when I made quite a few points in post #900 addressed to you, your best response was not to agree, not to form a rebuttal, not to add additional information -- not to "edify or elevate" the discussion in any way -- but instead you just just snottily made the puerile comment, "How very convenient of your personal thesaurus."
This is more typical of your posts than not. And if you actually spent any one whole post actually discussing the merits of an issue in evolutionary biology and providing evidence for your position, I must have missed it.
Begone, troll. You have nothing of value to teach us, except perhaps to serve as a bad example, and an object lesson in hypocrisy.