This reminds me of a poll taken years ago that asked people what they thought of
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Large numbers said it was way to radical.
And right there is the crux of the issue.
Until Islam-ism is separated from Islam and recognized as a different entity in the minds of the general public (and govt), and then widely and constantly prosecuted under US Code as either Sedition, or Treason, or Racketeering, we will continue to have the PC crowd and the moslem-apologists rush to defend all of Islam.
This only confuses the issue.
Any moslem who crosses over the line and starts in with subversive activities or sedition against the US is no longer practicing religion peaceably in the US.
And if that activity is at the heart of Islam, then their imams had better get on the stick and tone it down in the US.
Because that is against US code.
I think that's the only way to buy time, by recognizing these as separate issues.