Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wanted: Israeli neocons
Jerusalem Post ^ | 12-16-04 | CAROLINE GLICK

Posted on 12/17/2004 4:48:52 AM PST by SJackson

Israel's passivity in the face of Palestinian corruption, authoritarianism and hate indicates that what Israel needs most desperately is for a movement of Israeli neoconservatives to arise and "take control" of Israel's foreign policy.

Speaking at the Interdisciplinary Center's Herzliya Conference on Monday, IDF Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Moshe Ya'alon said that Israel's "interest is to separate the general Palestinian population from those involved in terrorism." This, of course, stands at the core of all anti-guerrilla and counterterror operational thinking.

Ya'alon noted the economic devastation that the Palestinian terror war has wrought on the general Palestinian population. Repeated suicide attacks at the Erez Industrial Park, where some 4,000 Gazans worked each day to support some 35,000 people, forced Israel to close the park. This week's attack against an IDF outpost on the border between Gaza and Egypt forced the army to close the border-crossing terminal, preventing Gazans from conducting business in Egypt. Suicide bombers disguised as ordinary workers have forced Israel to stringently limit the number of Palestinians working in Israel and to erect roadblocks throughout Judea and Samaria.

Israel has, over the past four years, and indeed since the first Palestinian suicide bomber introduced himself to Israeli civilians back in 1994, tried to develop methods of screening cargo and workers that would make Palestinian economic activity possible while preventing the infiltration of human bombs. Additionally, as Ya'alon noted, Israel has worked to ensure that the health and education systems in Judea, Samaria and Gaza have continued to operate. This, in spite of the fact that terrorists have hidden in maternity and cancer wards from Bethlehem to Jenin and that the Palestinian school system teaches children that their life goal should be to become a suicide bomber.

Yet, in spite of all of Israel's attempts to separate the broader Palestinian population from the terrorists, Ya'alon admitted that support for the terrorists had not waned, nor had enthusiasm for terrorism in general. In his words, IDF counterterror operations over the past two years "have decreased the ability, not the motivation" of Palestinians to carry out attacks against Israelis.

And so it can be said that the IDF, and Israel as a whole, have failed in the mission of separating the general Palestinian population from those involved in terrorism.

How can this be the case? After all, Israel's leaders have never declared war on the Palestinians. To the contrary, every time it seemed there was a break in the clouds, Israel moved quickly to embrace any opportunity to begin discussions with Palestinian officials – whether at the political level or among the various official Palestinian militia commanders.

An answer to this seeming paradox was provided by The Jerusalem Post's Khaled Abu Toameh in a dispatch from Gaza earlier in the week. Toameh reported the case of Dr. Hassan Nurani, a psychologist from Gaza City who wished to run for the PA's presidency. Nurani composed a platform calling for the building of a "civilized and moral society." He was able to collect the requisite 5,000 signatures to submit his candidacy but couldn't afford the $3000 needed to register for the election. Desperate to run, Nurani tried selling off his small parcel of land and his home furnishings. But he still wasn't able to raise the sum, which is the rough equivalent of an annual salary in Gaza.

It is possible that Dr. Nurani supports terrorism. It is possible that he is not willing to live in a Palestinian society which exists alongside a strong and vibrant Jewish state. It is possible that he insists that Israel allow millions of foreign-born Arabs to immigrate freely into Israel as a condition for peace. But we'll never know, because he is too poor to tell us.

And then we have the frontrunner for the Palestinian presidency, new PLO head Mahmoud Abbas. He's the only show in town. It doesn't seem to bother anyone that Yasser Arafat's deputy of 40 years has refused to call for an end to the Palestinian terror war, saying just Wednesday in Saudi Arabia that he didn't mean to offend anyone when he said the day before that violence against Israel is counterproductive.

"All I meant," Abbas explained, "is that we are in a phase that does not necessitate arms because we want to negotiate." And in the meantime, he decried Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom's call earlier in the day for the international community to build permanent housing for the millions of Arabs, whose ancestors may have once lived in Israel, who have been interned in UN refugee camps in the Arab world for the past 55 years. "Any proposal regarding the resettlement of the refugees is completely rejected," Abbas, the soon-to-be-democratically elected Palestinian leader, said.

Shalom's call for the rehabilitation of the residents of the UN refugee camps was given in the course of his address to the Herzliya Conference. Aside from daring to raise the possibility of letting these poor people finally be free of the burden of living their lives as political symbols, his speech was actually wholly supportive of the combative, rejectionist Abbas.

Shalom devoted much of his address to calling for the convention of a second Aqaba summit with US President George W. Bush, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Abbas right after the January 9 elections. In his words: "The lead actors from the first Aqaba summit, which took place in June 2003 – Sharon, Bush and Abu Mazen [Abbas] – are the same actors today, but stronger."

So, in the run-up to the Palestinian election, which is supposed to be the first step toward the liberalization and democratization of Palestinian society, the presumptive winner – who stands opposed to any action against terror operatives or compromise on the so-called refugees that would enable peace to be achieved – is embraced as a positive development, a window of opportunity and a foregone conclusion.

In an interview with the Post's Ruthie Blum appearing today, Palestinian apologist extraordinaire Hanan Ashrawi assailed Bush for adopting "the neocon agenda" in calling for the transformation of Palestinian society from a terror-supporting and -engendering society into a peaceful democratic one before the establishment of a Palestinian state. In her words, "You don't use democracy for justifying the existence of states. You would then have to remove many states. Self-determination for Palestinians is a right that has to be implemented as a way of bringing peace and stability to the region. Therefore, you don't make a state dependent on its system of government."

And Ashrawi isn't alone. In his speech at the conference on Tuesday, Labor party leader and soon-to-be acting prime minister Shimon Peres assailed the notion that democratic reform is a necessary condition for peaceful relations.

Indeed, the very thought that Palestinian society must be democratized meets its staunchest opposition from Israeli elites. In his column in Yediot Ahronot last Friday, Nahum Barnea, Israel's journalistic supremo and proud socialist, wrote scathingly of Bush's attachment to the notions of democracy and morality. Speaking of Bush's reading of Minister-without-Portfolio Natan Sharansky's book, The Case for Democracy, which argues that peaceful relations are contingent on individual freedom and democracy, Barnea sneered, "The book publisher can now advertise it as 'the only book the president has read in the last 10 years.'" He then went on to witheringly criticize Sharansky's book, describing it as "clear, easily digestible, unburdened by doubt, moralistic, very positive and totally simplistic."

Israel's elitists, like Barnea and Peres, and their sheep-like followers like Shalom, no doubt took comfort in the obnoxious responses evinced toward the Bush administration's policy doctrine of bringing democracy to the Arab world during last Saturday's conference on the topic in Rabat, Morocco. There, US Secretary of State Colin Powell was barraged by angry statements from the Egyptian, Saudi and Libyan foreign ministers, who claimed that the US can't talk about democracy until "the peace process" goes forward and US occupation of Iraq comes to an end.

Even German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer, the champion of the Israeli Left, said that progress toward peace between Israel and the Palestinians "will lend all reform and modernization efforts in the Arab world unprecedented momentum."

It isn't surprising that the same people who demonize their political opposition in Israel as warmongering extremists and potential political assassins would have such a low opinion of the possibility that Arabs might, if given the opportunity, choose to live freely and at peace with Israel and the rest of their neighbors.

And yet, as The Washington Post's editorialist noted on Wednesday, even as the Arab potentates were berating the Americans for daring to discuss democracy with them, Arab human rights activists who also participated in the conference insisted that the Americans continue to pressure their governments and that "Palestinian and Iraqi issues should not be used as excuses for not launching reforms."

And what did these people want? They demanded that their governments "allow free ownership of media institutions and sources; allow freedom of expression and especially freedom of assembly and meetings; ensure women's rights and remove all forms of inequality and discrimination against women in the Arab world; and immediately release reformers, human rights activists and political prisoners."

The American neoconservatives, who have been the most visible proponents of democracy in the Arab world and who Barnea, echoing Ashrawi, alleges "control the foreign policy of the Bush administration," have often been accused of working for Israel. Yet, as our elites' revulsion with democracy and our government's silence on the issue shows, American democracy advocates have almost no one to talk to in Israel. Indeed, Israel's passivity in the face of Palestinian corruption, authoritarianism and hate indicates that what Israel needs most desperately is for a movement of Israeli neoconservatives to arise and "take control" of Israel's foreign policy.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last
To: PiersGaveston
Is this some bizarre F.R. mating ritual that I haven't been told about? Any way, delighted to make your acquaintance.

Nah, just an indication that you're a Nazi troll.

Let us now take a moment to mourn those fine, upstanding Canaanite men, women, and children who were brutally and indiscriminately slaughtered, just because the Creator of the Universe so ordered. [/sarcasm]

81 posted on 12/17/2004 12:46:12 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Okay, Chanukkah's over, y'all. Chr*stmas and "kwanzaa" have to go it alone now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

I'm thinking he was a retread as well, but what any of his previous handles may have been I am not sure of.


82 posted on 12/17/2004 12:52:05 PM PST by Darksheare ("His heart went dead underneath her gaze" - The Book of Foreshadowed Sorrows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Alouette; ariamne

True, skunk tended to be rather rabid in his behavior.

And yes, that actually was rather quick of the Mods to show him the door.

He seemed to be a retread ad rdb3 noted, but what "pierre's" previous handles may have been I am unsure.


83 posted on 12/17/2004 12:54:19 PM PST by Darksheare ("His heart went dead underneath her gaze" - The Book of Foreshadowed Sorrows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: PiersGaveston
Yes the Arabs of occupying the land, and have been doing for a few centuries. But that's not good enough for the Eretz Israel types, who would push them off (preferably killing them)

You mean like the way they killed the Canaanites and then "stole" their land? But you accept that, don't you? After all, all "good chr*stians" have to claim the ancient Canaanite-genociding Jews were their own spiritual forbears.

whilst spitting in the face of the Christian leaders.

You mean "chr*stian leaders" like Sabbah, who attacks the idea that the Bible means what it says but should be dissected according to modern higher criticism?

I wish I was over there to spit in his face personally.

84 posted on 12/17/2004 12:57:31 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Okay, Chanukkah's over, y'all. Chr*stmas and "kwanzaa" have to go it alone now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PiersGaveston
I mean those (both Jews and some protestant Christians) who apply a Divine Right to the Jewish possession of the entire land of ancient Israel. I have no problem with them holding that position, but as it is based on a particular view of revelation they should not be surprised when other people disagree with them; especially when grotesque means of accomplishing it are used.

Ah, you mean chr*stians who actually believe the Bible is the inerrant word of G-d as opposed to blasphemers who insist G-d is the author of falsehood and error.

Wait a minute--is this Patriarch Sabbah???

Hey mods, we have an actual celebrity on FR! "His beatitude" the Supreme Higher Critic of the Catholics in 'Eretz Yisra'el has joined Free Republic to defend the immemorial chr*stian doctrines of partial inerrancy and the documentary hypothesis!

85 posted on 12/17/2004 1:09:55 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Okay, Chanukkah's over, y'all. Chr*stmas and "kwanzaa" have to go it alone now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Oops! He was blessedly gone before I posted my responses to him/her.

I believe he claimed to be British. Probably the Archbishop of Canterbury or some other non-literalist.

86 posted on 12/17/2004 1:17:02 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Okay, Chanukkah's over, y'all. Chr*stmas and "kwanzaa" have to go it alone now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: PiersGaveston
I have condemned in clear an unequivocal language terrorism, and the killing of innocents. Do you do the same?

How 'bout a statement of your opinion regarding Zionism?

87 posted on 12/17/2004 2:51:01 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: yonif; All

No Yonif I call that Israeli version of Extreme makeover


88 posted on 12/17/2004 3:12:40 PM PST by SevenofNine ("Not everybody , in it, for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The problem is not Democracy for the Palestinians. The problem is their demos and any thought that they can have a republic of any kind.
The Palestinians do not want to live in peace in a state along side Israel. They want to live in a state that replaces Israel.
Starry-eyed Wilsonians are part of the problem. Give me a blood and steel conservative.
89 posted on 12/17/2004 4:46:18 PM PST by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ariamne
Apology accepted.
90 posted on 12/17/2004 8:42:05 PM PST by Valin (Out Of My Mind; Back In Five Minutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Valin

My pleasure. Nothing to be ashamed of; I will always admit when I've been wrong. Now, about the flatworm? LOL!


91 posted on 12/17/2004 8:47:48 PM PST by ariamne (reformed liberal and Shieldmaiden of the Infidels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Thud

This is an Israeli politics neep.


92 posted on 12/18/2004 8:11:18 AM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Dammitall-I never get to have any fun with trolls.


93 posted on 12/22/2004 9:52:49 PM PST by snuffy smiff (Jean Fraud Kerry-the Botox BoatWarrior,"oh no, aground again and huge riceberg approaching")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson