Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mvpel
For his research, he consulted known pedophiles, including one who took detailed notes on a 24-hour marathon session of sexually abusing a young boy. In the name of "scientific open mindedness," he didn't report the pedophile to the police.

That doesn't make him a pedophile himself.

98 posted on 12/16/2004 8:50:05 AM PST by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Bluegrass Conservative

Right, of course. The accusations of him being a pedophile, from what I can tell, are sketchy at best. The evidence for him being an auto-masochist, abusing himself with a razor blade, seems far more substantiated, though.


104 posted on 12/16/2004 8:51:56 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

Whether he was a pedophile personally, or just espoused it, promoted it, and paid others to commite sex crimes against children, is there a huge difference?


111 posted on 12/16/2004 8:53:27 AM PST by little jeremiah (What would happen if everyone decided their own "right and wrong"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson