[Zhangliqun]

He was a nutcase, hired a known pedophile to molest and rape children and get back to him with the "findings", filmed his own porno, considered that sex with animals was normal, used primarily prisoners and other odd groups for his "10%" figure, used more "research" from a Nazi pedophile. It goes on and on.

Okay, with the exception of the "considered sex with animals was normal", shouldn't any researcher worth his salt be inquiring about the abnormal sexual activity as well?

Okay, it appears everyone is losing sight of the main point of discussing Mr. Kinsey's background. It's not to determine if he was guilty of any crime, it's to determine the validity (or lack thereof) of his research. But even aside from all that, if it's true he included prison rapes in his 10% figure, that's enough to invalidate his findings for me.

[Bluegrass Conservative]

But even aside from all that, if it's true he included prison rapes in his 10% figure, that's enough to invalidate his findings for me.

Why is that? Because prison rapes are more about power than sex?