"So what you're saying is that when science behaves like proponents of ID behave, science is wrong. What does that say about ID?"
Incorrect. What I am saying is that supposedly disspassionate and logical "scientists" are far from that. So, the concept that science/scientists are only interested in facts, and not ruled by emotion, is bogus. Your offering characutures of ID proponents don't make them that way. Actually, the group that tends to push for ID are the "moderates" in the spectrum of those holding to some form of divine creation.
Tell me more about the differences between how you have characterized the behavior of ID proponents and the behavior of the faulty scientists you described, if you would.