Is the Muslim mind impenetrable?
1 posted on
12/09/2004 3:23:19 AM PST by
miltonim
To: freedom44; DoctorZIn; JustPiper
To: miltonim
Technology and Freedom bump!
It's human nature for these UN control freaks to try to limit access to the internet. One thing we can rely on is that technology evolves faster than legislation! The slow, bureaucratic pace of the UN will never keep up with us.
3 posted on
12/09/2004 3:27:32 AM PST by
ovrtaxt
(Political correctness is the handmaiden of terrorism.)
To: miltonim
Will the internet be the David that slays theocracies?
4 posted on
12/09/2004 3:29:28 AM PST by
listenhillary
(My tagline died, memorials may be made to me via Paypal)
To: miltonim
To: miltonim
Another reason we should give thanks we live here. Looks like the bloggers have become the canary in the coal mine around the world..
6 posted on
12/09/2004 3:37:26 AM PST by
Route101
To: miltonim
It's not just muslims... I've seen posts in here decrying this or that on the internet, and demanding government censorship, often for the same things these governments are censoring (homosexual rights groups, etc.). Or, using the excuse of "fighting terrorism", we're sold the idea of censoring ideas. If you want a free people, we need a free marketplace of ideas.
9 posted on
12/09/2004 3:48:52 AM PST by
rpgdfmx
To: miltonim
We shouldn't take our own cyber freedom for granted. People of good intention, looking to anticipate all sorts of security threats, are already resuming the call to lasso our mostly free wheeling use of the internet.
I'm pretty sure most of you are aware of what George Tenet had to say:
The U.S. intelligence community needs to consider how terrorists might attempt to couple an attack on telecommunication networks with a physical attack, Tenet said during a keynote speech at the E-Gov Institute's homeland security conference in Washington.
"Efforts at physical security will not be enough, because the thinking enemy that we confront is going to school on our network vulnerabilities as well, and I think the two are inextricably linked," he said. "The number of known potential adversaries conducting research on information attacks is increasing rapidly and includes intelligence services, military organizations and nonstate entities."
According to Tenet "a loose collection of regional [terrorist] networks" now "thrive independently" worldwide by using telecommunications and the Internet to communicate with and learn from each other at almost no cost.
[ . . . ]
"I know that these actions would be controversial in this age where we still think the Internet is a free and open society with no control or accountability," he added. "But, ultimately, the Wild West must give way to governance and control." http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=04/12/06/5008621
To: miltonim
Obviously not, otherwise they wouldn't try to ban the internet.
To: miltonim
....UN-created working group on Internet governance They must think it is their's to control.
I vote we give it back to DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), the rightful owner.
14 posted on
12/09/2004 4:05:34 AM PST by
Socrates1
(Those whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.)
To: miltonim
I thought that Iranians were not Arabs.
15 posted on
12/09/2004 4:14:03 AM PST by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: miltonim
"Is the Muslim mind impenetrable?"
Their rulers are certainly trying to keep it that way.
The more I learn about Islam the more it seems to be just a totalitarian cult. Hardly a religion at all. Just a tool for keeping the people down.
17 posted on
12/09/2004 4:36:20 AM PST by
jocon307
(Jihad is world wide. Jihad is serious business. We ignore global jihad at our peril.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson