I tried to debate the facts and conclusions with Howlin and Onyx but they resort, virtually immediately, to personal invective.
They are not interested in debating, they have made up their minds and anyone who questions their conclusions is labeled dense and uninformed.
It's a pity because they have apparently devoted an unhealthy amount of their time and attention to this case.
Funny but it doesn't seem to bother them that one of the jurors was dismissed for apparently having made up her mind and was therefore unwilling to debate with the other jurors during deliberations.
Actually, we've given you the facts, chapter and verse; it's you who seems to have an agenda and won't give any credence whatsoever to what was testified to in court.
I'm not surprised you agee with Poodlebrain though; people who are misinformed usually congregate together.
Do you realize how many people on this forum read these threads -- and have been reading them all along?
Do you realize how silly you look when you continue to misstate facts, not to mention completely distort the known facts?
Memo to you: you have not debated one fact. In "fact" you have not mentioned one idea that hasn't been tediously reviewed and dismissed during the course of the trial.
They are not interested in debating, they have made up their minds and anyone who questions their conclusions is labeled dense and uninformed.
Just folks like you who wish to try my patience by your uninformed comments. Had you read transcripts or at least the daily log, you would know that your theories have been proven false in court.
It's a pity because they have apparently devoted an unhealthy amount of their time and attention to this case.
Yes, being informed is unhealthy, so please go on about living your life in ignorant bliss.