Memo to you: you have not debated one fact. In "fact" you have not mentioned one idea that hasn't been tediously reviewed and dismissed during the course of the trial.
They are not interested in debating, they have made up their minds and anyone who questions their conclusions is labeled dense and uninformed.
Just folks like you who wish to try my patience by your uninformed comments. Had you read transcripts or at least the daily log, you would know that your theories have been proven false in court.
It's a pity because they have apparently devoted an unhealthy amount of their time and attention to this case.
Yes, being informed is unhealthy, so please go on about living your life in ignorant bliss.
Perhaps you have forgotten that you have said to me that you have "wasted" too much time on me already. Now you've gone and wasted some more.
Perhaps ignorance of the Peterson case is, in fact, bliss. But ignorance of the the Peterson case does not indicate a "life in ignorant bliss."
You and Howlin have apparently invested so much of yourselves in the Peterson case that you are irritated by folks who have not invested as much and impatient with those who are not as informed about the Peterson case and yet are so audatious as to not accept you as the sole arbiters of the true facts of this matter.
It appears to me that you only want to converse with those with whom you are in total agreement...I for one would find that utterly boring.
In any event...I'll not tire you further with my ignorance of the Peterson case...if there is anything about which you two are not omniscient, feel free to engage me, as my ignorance is not absolute, and my patience is abundant.