Can someone answer this?
There have been two machine counts and the Rep candidate won them both.
I think it has been statistically shown that a hand count of 3 million cards will be LESS accurate than a machine count.
Why can't the Reps make a legal case that the uncertainty would be less with a machine count and therefore that one of the two machine counts should trump the hand count?
Fargo44
Because the law permits a hand count.